Evidence mapPaperPMID 38459161Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2024

Mediterranean-style dietary interventions in adults with cancer: a systematic review of the methodological approaches, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy.

Aoife McHugh, Ellie O'Connell, Bridie Gurd, Paige Rae, Elena S George, Amber S Kleckner, Brenton J Baguley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07007169 (Mediterranean Diet and Inequality in Early Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07007169 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Mediterranean Diet and Inequality in Early Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEsbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern DenmarkRan2025 to 2036Enrolled105ConditionsEarly Breast CancerArmsThe goal is daily consumption of a minimum of 30 grams of dietary fiber and weekly consumption of a minimum of 30 different plant foods, minimizing the amount of ultra-processed food., Standard Diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aoife McHugh *School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Ellie O'Connell *School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Bridie GurdSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Paige RaeSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Elena S GeorgeSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Amber S KlecknerDepartment of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5088-1139
Brenton J BaguleySchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia. b.baguley@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-8107
Deakin University · AUUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer and its treatments can lead to excess body fat, decreases in lean mass, cardiotoxicity, and other side effects. The Mediterranean diet (MED-diet) has the potential to improve clinical and supportive care outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the MED-diet on health outcomes in adults with cancer.

methodsThree databases were searched from inception to February 2023. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials testing a MED-diet intervention among adults with cancer. Within- and between-group differences for adherence, dietary intake and health outcomes were extracted.

resultsFifteen studies describing fourteen interventions were included, and there were considerable differences in study design and implementation of the MED-diet. Studies were predominately in women with a history of breast cancer. The MED-diet was safe with no adverse events reported, and feasible with high adherence and/or increases in MED-diet-compliant foods. The MED-diet when applied with an energy restriction below estimated requirements for weight loss demonstrated reductions in body weight (range: -3.9 kg to -0.7 kg). Interventions that showed significant reductions in body weight also improved quality of life. There is limited evidence to evaluating the MED-diet on cardiovascular and inflammatory markers, and heterogenous MED-diet prescriptions impede definitive conclusions on these health outcomes.

conclusionThe MED-diet was feasible and safe for adults with cancer. There were reported benefits for weight loss following a MED-diet when an energy restriction was applied, however further evaluation to determine the effects on cardiometabolic biomarkers and other outcomes are required.

Indexed as

Diet, MediterraneanNeoplasmsAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38459161
PMCPMC11182747
OpenAlexW4392581146

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.