Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459348›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Post-mortem skeletal survey (PMSS) versus post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) for the detection of corner metaphyseal lesions (CML) in children.

Susan Cheng Shelmerdine, Natasha Davendralingam, Dean Langan, Liina Palm, Chas Mangham, Owen J Arthurs, CORNRD Study Collaborators

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan Cheng ShelmerdineDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1H 3JH, UK. susan.shelmerdine@gosh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6642-9967
Natasha DavendralingamDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bedford, UK.
Dean LanganUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Liina PalmDepartment of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1H 3JH, UK.
Chas ManghamUniversity of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Owen J ArthursDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1H 3JH, UK.
CORNRD Study Collaborators
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre NIHR-301322NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCorner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT).

methodsA 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children's hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities.

resultsTwenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640).

conclusionPMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired. KEY POINTS: • Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed.

Indexed as

AutopsyChild AbuseFractures, BoneSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalePostmortem ImagingRetrospective StudiesAutopsyChild abuseFractures (bone)RadiographyTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID38459348
OpenAlexW4392630731

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.