Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38461317›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024

Incorporating genetic similarity of auxiliary samples into eGene identification under the transfer learning framework.

Shuo Zhang, Zhou Jiang, Ping Zeng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuo Zhang *Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Zhou Jiang *Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Ping ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China. zpstat@xzhmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2710-3440
Xuzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province KYCX22_2960Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province WSN-087the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2018M630607the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2019T120465the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81402765the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173630the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China BK20181472the Training Project for Youth Teams of Science and Technology Innovation at Xuzhou Medical University TD202008the Youth Foundation of Humanity and Social Science funded by Ministry of Education of China 18YJC910002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe term eGene has been applied to define a gene whose expression level is affected by at least one independent expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL). It is both theoretically and empirically important to identify eQTLs and eGenes in genomic studies. However, standard eGene detection methods generally focus on individual cis-variants and cannot efficiently leverage useful knowledge acquired from auxiliary samples into target studies.

methodsWe propose a multilocus-based eGene identification method called TLegene by integrating shared genetic similarity information available from auxiliary studies under the statistical framework of transfer learning. We apply TLegene to eGene identification in ten TCGA cancers which have an explicit relevant tissue in the GTEx project, and learn genetic effect of variant in TCGA from GTEx. We also adopt TLegene to the Geuvadis project to evaluate its usefulness in non-cancer studies.

resultsWe observed substantial genetic effect correlation of cis-variants between TCGA and GTEx for a larger number of genes. Furthermore, consistent with the results of our simulations, we found that TLegene was more powerful than existing methods and thus identified 169 distinct candidate eGenes, which was much larger than the approach that did not consider knowledge transfer across target and auxiliary studies. Previous studies and functional enrichment analyses provided empirical evidence supporting the associations of discovered eGenes, and it also showed evidence of allelic heterogeneity of gene expression. Furthermore, TLegene identified more eGenes in Geuvadis and revealed that these eGenes were mainly enriched in cells EBV transformed lymphocytes tissue.

conclusionOverall, TLegene represents a flexible and powerful statistical method for eGene identification through transfer learning of genetic similarity shared across auxiliary and target studies.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansMachine LearningQuantitative Trait LociExpression quantitative trait lociHarmonic mean P-valueHierarchical modelingJoint effect testLinear mixed modelTransfer learning framework

Identifiers

PMID38461317
PMCPMC10924384
OpenAlexW4392615468

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.