SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2024
Urea breath test for
Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The association between Helicobacter pylori infection and diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis of 45 case-control studies.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Atypical acuteFujita medical journal · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Profiling of Urinary Volatile Organic Compounds Reveals Distinct Diagnostic Signatures for Gastric Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- VTH BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS CONFERENCE ON HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Article
- Update on the pathogenesis and clinical management ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025Review
- Prevalence and risk factors ofFuture science OA · 2025Article
- Recent advances in rapid detection of Helicobacter pylori by lateral flow assay.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- ImprovingFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Change in Diagnosis ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
aimTo determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of
methodsWe conducted an independent search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases until April 2022. Our search included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (
resultsThe titles and abstracts of 4621 studies were screened; 79 articles were retrieved and selected for full-text reading. Finally, 60 studies were included in the diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Our analysis demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy of
conclusionIn summary, our study has demonstrated that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.