Evidence mapPaperPMID 38463624Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2024

The paradigm change from reactive medical services to 3PM in ischemic stroke: a holistic approach utilising tear fluid multi-omics, mitochondria as a vital biosensor and AI-based multi-professional data interpretation.

Olga Golubnitschaja, Jiri Polivka, Pavel Potuznik, Martin Pesta, Ivana Stetkarova, Alena Mazurakova, Lenka Lackova, Peter Kubatka, Martina Kropp, Gabriele Thumann and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Olga GolubnitschajaPredictive, Preventive and Personalised (3P) Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Jiri PolivkaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel PotuznikDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Plzen and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin PestaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ivana StetkarovaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alena MazurakovaDepartment of Anatomy, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Lenka LackovaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Peter KubatkaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Martina KroppExperimental Ophthalmology, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Gabriele ThumannExperimental Ophthalmology, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Carl ErbPrivate Institute of Applied Ophthalmology, Berlin, Germany.
Holger FröhlichArtificial Intelligence & Data Science Group, Fraunhofer SCAI, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Wei WangEdith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
Babak BabanThe Dental College of Georgia, Departments of Neurology and Surgery, The Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, USA.
Marko KapallaNegentropic Systems, Ružomberok, Slovakia.
Niva ShapiraDepartment of Nutrition, School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, Israel.
Kneginja RichterCuraMed Tagesklinik Nürnberg GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany.
Alexander KarabatsiakisDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology II, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ivica SmokovskiUniversity Clinic of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Skopje, University Goce Delcev, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Stip, North Macedonia.
Leonard Christopher SchmeelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Eleni GkikaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Friedemann PaulCharité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Paolo PariniCardio Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine Huddinge, and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, and Medicine Unit of Endocrinology, Theme Inflammation and Ageing, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jiri PolivkaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Plzen and Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of death and disability combined. The estimated global economic burden by stroke is over US$891 billion per year. Within three decades (1990-2019), the incidence increased by 70%, deaths by 43%, prevalence by 102%, and DALYs by 143%. Of over 100 million people affected by stroke, about 76% are ischemic stroke (IS) patients recorded worldwide. Contextually, ischemic stroke moves into particular focus of multi-professional groups including researchers, healthcare industry, economists, and policy-makers. Risk factors of ischemic stroke demonstrate sufficient space for cost-effective prevention interventions in primary (suboptimal health) and secondary (clinically manifested collateral disorders contributing to stroke risks) care. These risks are interrelated. For example, sedentary lifestyle and toxic environment both cause mitochondrial stress, systemic low-grade inflammation and accelerated ageing; inflammageing is a low-grade inflammation associated with accelerated ageing and poor stroke outcomes. Stress overload, decreased mitochondrial bioenergetics and hypomagnesaemia are associated with systemic vasospasm and ischemic lesions in heart and brain of all age groups including teenagers. Imbalanced dietary patterns poor in folate but rich in red and processed meat, refined grains, and sugary beverages are associated with hyperhomocysteinaemia, systemic inflammation, small vessel disease, and increased IS risks. Ongoing 3PM research towards vulnerable groups in the population promoted by the European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine (EPMA) demonstrates promising results for the holistic patient-friendly non-invasive approach utilising tear fluid-based health risk assessment, mitochondria as a vital biosensor and AI-based multi-professional data interpretation as reported here by the EPMA expert group. Collected data demonstrate that IS-relevant risks and corresponding molecular pathways are interrelated. For examples, there is an evident overlap between molecular patterns involved in IS and diabetic retinopathy as an early indicator of IS risk in diabetic patients. Just to exemplify some of them such as the 5-aminolevulinic acid/pathway, which are also characteristic for an altered mitophagy patterns, insomnia, stress regulation and modulation of microbiota-gut-brain crosstalk. Further, ceramides are considered mediators of oxidative stress and inflammation in cardiometabolic disease, negatively affecting mitochondrial respiratory chain function and fission/fusion activity, altered sleep-wake behaviour, vascular stiffness and remodelling. Xanthine/pathway regulation is involved in mitochondrial homeostasis and stress-driven anxiety-like behaviour as well as molecular mechanisms of arterial stiffness. In order to assess individual health risks, an application of machine learning (AI tool) is essential for an accurate data interpretation performed by the multiparametric analysis. Aspects presented in the paper include the needs of young populations and elderly, personalised risk assessment in primary and secondary care, cost-efficacy, application of innovative technologies and screening programmes, advanced education measures for professionals and general population-all are essential pillars for the paradigm change from reactive medical services to 3PM in the overall IS management promoted by the EPMA.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBehavioural patternsCytokine storm (COVID-19)Diabetes mellitusDiabetic retinopathyExpert recommendationsFlammer syndromeHealthcare economyHealth policyHealth risk assessmentHealth-to-disease transitionIndividualised patient profileInflammationIschemic strokeMitochondrial healthMitophagyPatient-friendly non-invasive approachPopulation screeningPredictive preventive personalised medicine (PPPM / 3PM)Primary and secondary careSleep medicineSuboptimal healthSudden cardiac arrest/deathTear fluid analysisViromics and metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID38463624
PMCPMC10923756

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.