Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463980›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Controlling the human connectome with spatially diffuse input signals.

Richard Betzel, Maria Grazia Puxeddu, Caio Seguin, Vincent Bazinet, Andrea Luppi, Alina Podschun, S Parker Singleton, Joshua Faskowitz, Vibin Parakkattu, Bratislav Misic and 3 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Richard BetzelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington IN 47401.
Maria Grazia PuxedduDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington IN 47401.
Caio SeguinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington IN 47401.
Vincent BazinetMontréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Andrea LuppiMontréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Alina PodschunHumboldt-Unversität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
S Parker SingletonDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-7102-7820
Joshua FaskowitzDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington IN 47401.
Vibin ParakkattuDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington IN 47401.
Bratislav MisicMontréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Sebastian MarkettHumboldt-Unversität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Amy KuceyeskiDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Linden ParkesDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

Funding

Dynamic approaches to understanding social cognitive aging: A social network neuroscience approachR01AG075044 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Richard F Betzel, Anne Catherine Krendl · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
Discovering prognostic neuroimaging biomarkers of the psychosis spectrum using network control theoryR00MH127296 · NIMH · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PARKES, LINDEN · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075044NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH127296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain is never at "rest"; its activity is constantly fluctuating over time, transitioning from one brain state-a whole-brain pattern of activity-to another. Network control theory offers a framework for understanding the effort - energy - associated with these transitions. One branch of control theory that is especially useful in this context is "optimal control", in which input signals are used to selectively drive the brain into a target state. Typically, these inputs are introduced independently to the nodes of the network (each input signal is associated with exactly one node). Though convenient, this input strategy ignores the continuity of cerebral cortex - geometrically, each region is connected to its spatial neighbors, allowing control signals, both exogenous and endogenous, to spread from their foci to nearby regions. Additionally, the spatial specificity of brain stimulation techniques is limited, such that the effects of a perturbation are measurable in tissue surrounding the stimulation site. Here, we adapt the network control model so that input signals have a spatial extent that decays exponentially from the input site. We show that this more realistic strategy takes advantage of spatial dependencies in structural connectivity and activity to reduce the energy (effort) associated with brain state transitions. We further leverage these dependencies to explore near-optimal control strategies such that, on a per-transition basis, the number of input signals required for a given control task is reduced, in some cases by two orders of magnitude. This approximation yields network-wide maps of input site density, which we compare to an existing database of functional, metabolic, genetic, and neurochemical maps, finding a close correspondence. Ultimately, not only do we propose a more efficient framework that is also more adherent to well-established brain organizational principles, but we also posit neurobiologically grounded bases for optimal control.

Identifiers

PMID38463980
PMCPMC10925126

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.