Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466166›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2024

Characterization of differences in immune responses during bolus and continuous infusion endotoxin challenges using mathematical modelling.

Kristen A Windoloski, Susanne Janum, Ronan M G Berg, Mette S Olufsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristen A WindoloskiDepartment of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Susanne JanumFrederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospitals, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Ronan M G BergDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette S OlufsenDepartment of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2694-0044

Funding

Centre for Physical Activity ResearchTrygFonden 101390TrygFonden 20045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endotoxin administration is commonly used to study the inflammatory response, and though traditionally given as a bolus injection, it can be administered as a continuous infusion over multiple hours. Several studies hypothesize that the latter better represents the prolonged and pronounced inflammation observed in conditions like sepsis. Yet very few experimental studies have administered endotoxin using both strategies, leaving significant gaps in determining the underlying mechanisms responsible for their differing immune responses. We used mathematical modelling to analyse cytokine data from two studies administering a 2 ng kg

Indexed as

CytokinesEndotoxinsAdultFemaleHumansInflammationInfusions, IntravenousInterleukin-10Interleukin-8LipopolysaccharidesMaleModels, TheoreticalMonocytesTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCytokinesEndotoxinsInterleukin-10Interleukin-8LipopolysaccharidesTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaadministration methodcontinuous infusioncytokinesdata analysisendotoxin challengeinflammationmathematical modelling

Identifiers

PMID38466166
PMCPMC11061636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.