Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466445›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2024

Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review of the evidence.

Jeremy Meyer, Elin Meyer, Guillaume Meurette, Emilie Liot, Christian Toso, Frédéric Ris

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Robotic right colectomy is associated with reduced conversion to open surgery in patients with obesity.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremy MeyerDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil,14, 41211, Geneva, Switzerland. jeremy.meyer@hcuge.ch.
Elin MeyerKarolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Guillaume MeuretteDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil,14, 41211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Emilie LiotDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil,14, 41211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christian TosoDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil,14, 41211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frédéric RisDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil,14, 41211, Geneva, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotics may facilitate the realization of fully minimally invasive right hemicolectomy, including intra-corporeal anastomosis and off-midline extraction, when compared to laparoscopy. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with robotic right hemicolectomy in terms of peri-operative outcomes. MEDLINE was searched for original studies comparing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with robotic right hemicolectomy in terms of peri-operative outcomes. The systematic review complied with the PRISMA 2020 recommendations. Variables related to patients' demographics, surgical procedures, post-operative recovery and pathological outcomes were collected and qualitatively assessed. Two-hundred and ninety-three publications were screened, 277 were excluded and 16 were retained for qualitative analysis. The majority of included studies were observational and of limited sample size. When the type of anastomosis was left at surgeon's discretion, intra-corporeal anastomosis was favoured in robotic right hemicolectomy (4/4 studies). When compared to laparoscopy, robotics allowed harvesting more lymph nodes (4/15 studies), a lower conversion rate to open surgery (5/14 studies), a shorter time to faeces (2/3 studies) and a shorter length of stay (5/14 studies), at the cost of a longer operative time (13/14 studies). Systematic review of existing studies, which are mostly non-randomized, suggests that robotic surgery may facilitate fully minimally invasive right hemicolectomy, including intra-corporeal anastomosis, and offer improved post-operative recovery.

Indexed as

ColectomyLaparoscopyLength of StayOperative TimeRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnastomosis, SurgicalConversion to Open SurgeryHumansTreatment OutcomeColon cancerColorectal cancerDa VinciMISRHCRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38466445
PMCPMC10927893
OpenAlexW4392662574

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.