ArticleScientific reports2024
BrainNet: a fusion assisted novel optimal framework of residual blocks and stacked autoencoders for multimodal brain tumor classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- MM FD ConvFormer multimodal frequency aware deformable CNN transformer network for robust brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A deep learning based NeuroFusionNet approach for automated brain tumor diagnosis from MRI.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Brain Tumour Classification Model Based on Spatial Block-Residual Block Collaborative Architecture with Strip Pooling Feature Fusion.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Comparing Handcrafted Radiomics Versus Latent Deep Learning Features of Admission Head CT for Hemorrhagic Stroke Outcome Prediction.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Brain Tumor Classification in MRI Scans Using Edge Computing and a Shallow Attention-Guided CNN.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Article
- Unsupervised data imputation with multiple importance sampling variational autoencoders.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigating the Key Trends in Applying Artificial Intelligence to Health Technologies: A Scoping Review.PloS one · 2025Article
- CerviFusionNet: A multi-modal, hybrid CNN-transformer-GRU model for enhanced cervical lesion multi-classification.iScience · 2024Article
- A Deep Learning Based Intelligent Decision Support System for Automatic Detection of Brain Tumor.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2024Article
- Enhanced MRI-based brain tumor segmentation and feature extraction using Berkeley wavelet transform and ETCCNN.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A significant issue in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for medical applications is brain tumor classification. Radiologists could reliably detect tumors using machine learning algorithms without extensive surgery. However, a few important challenges arise, such as (i) the selection of the most important deep learning architecture for classification (ii) an expert in the field who can assess the output of deep learning models. These difficulties motivate us to propose an efficient and accurate system based on deep learning and evolutionary optimization for the classification of four types of brain modalities (t1 tumor, t1ce tumor, t2 tumor, and flair tumor) on a large-scale MRI database. Thus, a CNN architecture is modified based on domain knowledge and connected with an evolutionary optimization algorithm to select hyperparameters. In parallel, a Stack Encoder-Decoder network is designed with ten convolutional layers. The features of both models are extracted and optimized using an improved version of Grey Wolf with updated criteria of the Jaya algorithm. The improved version speeds up the learning process and improves the accuracy. Finally, the selected features are fused using a novel parallel pooling approach that is classified using machine learning and neural networks. Two datasets, BraTS2020 and BraTS2021, have been employed for the experimental tasks and obtained an improved average accuracy of 98% and a maximum single-classifier accuracy of 99%. Comparison is also conducted with several classifiers, techniques, and neural nets; the proposed method achieved improved performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.