Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468200›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2024

The effect of in vitro simulated colonic pH gradients on microbial activity and metabolite production using common prebiotics as substrates.

Zhuqing Xie, Weiwei He, Alex Gobbi, Hanne Christine Bertram, Dennis Sandris Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. pH regulates gut bacterial tryptophan metabolism.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Emerging advances in intestinal models for in vitro preclinical research.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Influence of cervicovaginal microbiota onMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Zhuqing XieDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. zhuqing@food.ku.dk.
Weiwei HeDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Alex GobbiDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Hanne Christine BertramDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Dennis Sandris NielsenDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. dn@food.ku.dk.
University of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University · DKState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology · CN

Funding

China Scholarship Council 202006150033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe interplay between gut microbiota (GM) and the metabolization of dietary components leading to the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) is affected by a range of factors including colonic pH and carbohydrate source. However, there is still only limited knowledge on how the GM activity and metabolite production in the gastrointestinal tract could be influenced by pH and the pH gradient increases along the colon.

resultsHere we investigate the effect of pH gradients corresponding to levels typically found in the colon on GM composition and metabolite production using substrates inulin, lactose, galactooligosaccharides (GOS), and fructooligosaccharide (FOS) in an in vitro colon setup. We investigated 3 different pH regimes (low, 5.2 increasing to 6.4; medium, 5.6 increasing to 6.8 and high, 6.0 increasing to 7.2) for each fecal inoculum and found that colonic pH gradients significantly influenced in vitro simulated GM structure, but the influence of fecal donor and substrate was more pronounced. Low pH regimes strongly influenced GM with the decreased relative abundance of Bacteroides spp. and increased Bifidobacterium spp. Higher in vitro simulated colonic pH promoted the production of SCFAs in a donor- and substrate-dependent manner. The butyrate producer Butyricimonas was enriched at higher pH conditions, where also butyrate production was increased for inulin. The relative abundance of Phascolarctobacterium, Bacteroides, and Rikenellaceae also increased at higher colonic pH, which was accompanied by increased production of propionate with GOS and FOS as substrates.

conclusionsTogether, our results show that colonic substrates such as dietary fibres influence GM composition and metabolite production, not only by being selectively utilized by specific microbes, but also because of their SCFA production, which in turn also influences colonic pH and overall GM composition and activity. Our work provides details about the effect of the gradients of rising pH from the proximal to distal colon on fermenting dietary substrates in vitro and highlights the importance of considering pH in GM research.

Indexed as

InulinPrebioticsBacteroidetesButyratesFatty Acids, VolatileFecesFermentationProton-Motive ForceButyratesFatty Acids, VolatileInulinPrebioticsColonic pHGut microbiotaIn vitro colonic fermentationPrebioticsShort-chain fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID38468200
PMCPMC10926653
OpenAlexW4392659330

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.