Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468498›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Text Message-Based Cessation Intervention for People Who Smoked or Used Smokeless Tobacco in India: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Abhijit Nadkarni, Leena Gaikwad, Miriam Sequeira, Joseline D'souza, Megan Lopes, Rajanish Haldankar, Pratima Murthy, Richard Velleman, Urvita Bhatia, Felix Naughton

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Systematic Development of a Mobile Phone Delivered Text-Messaging Tobacco Cessation Intervention in India.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abhijit NadkarniCentre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5832-5236
Leena GaikwadAddictions and Related Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Miriam SequeiraAddictions and Related Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-3934
Joseline D'souzaAddictions and Related Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Megan LopesAddictions and Related Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Rajanish HaldankarAddictions and Related Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Pratima MurthyNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Richard VellemanAddictions and Related Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Urvita BhatiaAddictions and Related Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Felix NaughtonSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9790-2796

Funding

Department of Health and Social CareForeign, Commonwealth & Development OfficeMedical Research Council MR/R018456/1Wellcome TrustWellcome, UK MR/R018456/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the high burden of tobacco use in India, users do not have access to adequate help. This pilot trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a text messaging intervention for tobacco cessation, generate preliminary estimates of its impact, and fine-tune procedures for a definitive trial. AIMS AND

methodsParallel two-arm single blind individually randomized controlled pilot trial with nested qualitative study. Participants included adult current tobacco users (smoked and smokeless). Eligible and consenting participants were randomized to receive either (1) text messaging intervention (ToQuit) which covered specific content areas such as psychoeducation about consequences of tobacco use and benefits of quitting and tobacco avoidance strategies or (2) information about tobacco cessation helplines such as the helpline number and the languages in which tobacco cessation support was available (control). Feasibility data included screening and consent rates, treatment dropouts, and outcome ascertainment. The primary abstinence outcome was self-reported abstinence from tobacco in the past seven days at 3 months post-randomization. In-depth interviews were conducted with a subsample of participants primarily to collect acceptability data. The primary abstinence analysis used a chi-squared test and logistic regression (complete case), and qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsNinety-eight participants were randomized into the two trial arms; 77 (79%) completed outcome evaluation. No between-arm differences in abstinence were found though findings favored the intervention (7-day abstinence: ToQuit 23%, control 19%; adjusted odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.38, 3.97). Participants appreciated the language, comprehensibility, and relevance of the messages; and reported overall satisfaction with and positive impact from the intervention on their lives.

conclusionsThe findings indicate the acceptability and feasibility of ToQuit and if found effective, it could be a potentially scalable first-line response to tobacco use in low-resource settings. IMPLICATIONS: Our pilot randomized control trial provides sufficient findings supporting the acceptability and feasibility of an intervention for tobacco cessation which is suitable for a context which has a shortage of healthcare workers and for individuals who use smoked or smokeless tobacco. This is critical on a background of limited contextually relevant interventions for a problem with a high burden in low- and middle-income countries such as India.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesText MessagingTobacco, SmokelessTobacco Use CessationAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSingle-Blind MethodSmoking CessationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38468498
PMCPMC11339165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.