ReviewCurrent Alzheimer research2024
A Review on the Use of Modern Computational Methods in Alzheimer's Disease-Detection and Prediction.
Review in Current Alzheimer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discoveries in the field of medical sciences are blooming rapidly at the cost of voluminous efforts. Presently, multidisciplinary research activities have been especially contributing to catering cutting-edge solutions to critical problems in the domain of medical sciences. The modern age computing resources have proved to be a boon in this context. Effortless solutions have become a reality, and thus, the real beneficiary patients are able to enjoy improved lives. One of the most emerging problems in this context is Alzheimer's disease, an incurable neurological disorder. For this, early diagnosis is made possible with benchmark computing tools and schemes. These benchmark schemes are the results of novel research contributions being made intermittently in the timeline. In this review, an attempt is made to explore all such contributions in the past few decades. A systematic review is made by categorizing these contributions into three folds, namely, First, Second, and Third Generations. However, priority is given to the latest ones as a handful of literature reviews are already available for the classical ones. Key contributions are discussed vividly. The objectives set for this review are to bring forth the latest discoveries in computing methodologies, especially those dedicated to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. A detailed timeline of the contributions is also made available. Performance plots for certain key contributions are also presented for better graphical understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38468529What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.