ArticleHeliyon2024
Uncovering the subtype-specific disease module and the development of drug response prediction models for glioma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foundation models and deep learning for cancer drug response prediction: a framework for data, metrics, and validation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Biologically explainable multi-omics feature demonstrates greater learning potential by identifying tissue of origin, stages, and subtypes for pan-cancer classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Drug and Biomarker Discovery for Glioblastoma: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Cancers · 2025Review
- A semi-supervised weighted SPCA- and convolution KAN-based model for drug response prediction.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The poor prognosis of glioma patients brought attention to the need for effective therapeutic approaches for precision therapy. Here, we deployed algorithms relying on network medicine and artificial intelligence to design the framework for subtype-specific target identification and drug response prediction in glioma. We identified the driver mutations that were differentially expressed in each subtype of lower-grade glioma and glioblastoma multiforme and were linked to cancer-specific processes. Driver mutations that were differentially expressed were also subjected to subtype-specific disease module identification. The drugs from the drug bank database were retrieved to target these disease modules. However, the efficacy of anticancer drugs depends on the molecular profile of the cancer and varies among cancer patients due to intratumor heterogeneity. Hence, we developed a deep-learning-based drug response prediction framework using the experimental drug screening data. Models for 30 drugs that can target the disease module were developed, where drug response measured by IC50 was considered a response and gene expression and mutation data were considered predictor variables. The model construction consists of three steps: feature selection, data integration, and classification. We observed the consistent performance of the models in training, test, and validation datasets. Drug responses were predicted for particular cell lines derived from distinct subtypes of gliomas. We found that subtypes of gliomas respond differently to the drug, highlighting the importance of subtype-specific drug response prediction. Therefore, the development of personalized therapy by integrating network medicine and a deep learning-based approach can lead to cancer-specific treatment and improved patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.