ArticleHeliyon2024
DNA methylation characteristics associated with chemotherapy resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of NID2 and CDO1 methylation for ovarian cancer screening.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Epigenetic silencing of JAM3 promoted progression in serous ovarian carcinoma through PI3K/AKT pathway.Epigenomics · 2025Article
- Integrative Analysis of Gene Expression and Promoter Methylation to Differentiate High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer from Benign Tumors.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 Contributes to Breast Cancer Progression and Chemoresistance by Interacting with Collagen Type I.Cancers · 2024Article
- DNA methylation in human diseases.Heliyon · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The high mortality rate of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is often attributed to the frequent development of chemoresistance. DNA methylation is a predictive biomarker for chemoresistance. Methods: This study utilized DNA methylation profiles and relevant information from GEO and TCGA to identify different methylated CpG sites (DMCs) between chemoresistant and chemosensitive patients. Subsequently, we constructed chemoresistance risk models with DMCs. The genes corresponding to candidate DMCs in chemoresistance risk models were further analyzed to identify different methylated gene symbols (DMGs) associated with chemoresistance. The DMGs that showed a strong correlation with the corresponding DMCs were analyzed through immunohistochemistry. Results: Compared to chemosensitive EOC patients, chemoresistant patients showed 423 hypermethylated CpGs and 1445 hypomethylated CpGs. The chemoresistance risk models based on DMCs have shown the improved predictive ability for chemoresistance in EOC (AUC = 65.0-76.2%). The methylations of cg25510164, cg13154880, cg15362155 and cg08665359 were strongly associated with decreased risk of chemoresistance. Conversely, the methylation of cg08872590 and cg14739437 significantly increased the risk. We identified 13 DMGs, from 47 DMCs corresponding genes, between chemosensitive and chemoresistant samples. Among the DMGs, the expression levels of DDR2 and OPCML exhibited strong correlations with the corresponding DMCs. DDR2 and OPCML both showed enhanced expression in chemoresistant ovarian microarray tissue. Conclusions: Hypomethylated CpGs may play a significant role in DNA methylation associated with chemoresistance in EOC. The epigenetic modification of DDR2 could have important implications for the development of chemoresistance. Our study provides valuable insights for future research on DNA methylation in the chemoresistance of EOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.