ReviewJournal of experimental botany2024
Flowering time genes branching out.
Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- The molecular regulation of axillary bud fate determination and outgrowth into branch crown in strawberry involves BRC1.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Developing a mobile RNA delivery system for grafting trait improvement.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- An integrated fine-mapping, re-sequencing and transcriptome analysis provides further insights and candidate genes for silique number in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- QTL mapping for early heading of 'Haruka Nijo', the leading barley (Breeding science · 2026Article
- Identification, evolution, and expression analysis of the PEBP gene family in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and its role in flowering regulation via interaction with 14-3-3 proteins.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Acceleration of flowering in woody plants by grafting.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- A major FT/TFL1 regulatory locus (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- VULGARE ROW-TYPE SIX 5 binds to the promoter of tillering and floral homeotic genes to regulate their expression.Plant physiology · 2025Article
- Dancing molecules: group A bZIPs and PEBPs at the heart of plant development and stress responses.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Complex Signaling Networks Underlying Blue-Light-Mediated Floral Transition in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessing Functional Conservation AmongstPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Complexities of Flowering in Ornamental Plants: The Interplay of Genetics, Hormonal Networks, and Microbiome.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Role ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Historic rewiring of grass flowering time pathways and implications for crop improvement under climate change.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- From natural induction to artificial regulation: a review on the mechanisms and techniques of flowering in pineapple.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Article
- Integrated Analysis of microRNAs and Transcription Factor Targets in Floral Transition ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A single nucleotide substitution introducing premature stop codon within CsTFL1 explains the determinate-2 phenotype in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants are sessile by nature, and as such they have evolved to sense changes in seasonality and their surrounding environment, and adapt to these changes. One prime example of this is the regulation of flowering time in angiosperms, which is precisely timed by the coordinated action of two proteins: FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1). Both of these regulators are members of the PHOSPHATIDYLETHANOLAMINE BINDING PROTEIN (PEBP) family of proteins. These regulatory proteins do not interact with DNA themselves, but instead interact with transcriptional regulators, such as FLOWERING LOCUS D (FD). FT and TFL1 were initially identified as key regulators of flowering time, acting through binding with FD; however, PEBP family members are also involved in shaping plant architecture and development. In addition, PEBPs can interact with TCP transcriptional regulators, such as TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1 (TB1), a well-known regulator of plant architecture, and key domestication-related genes in many crops. Here, we review the role of PEBPs in flowering time, plant architecture, and development. As these are also key yield-related traits, we highlight examples from the model plant Arabidopsis as well as important food and feed crops such as, rice, barley, wheat, tomato, and potato.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.