ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2024
Pilot feasibility and efficacy of a strategy to sustain A1C improvement among diverse adults with type 2 diabetes completing a diabetes care management program.
Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEvidence-based strategies are needed to sustain improvements in outcomes following diabetes care management (DCM) programs. We examined the impact of Boot Camp-Plus (BC-Plus), an innovative sustaining strategy, on A1C among adults with type 2 diabetes completing a 3-month Diabetes Boot Camp (DBC). This health system sponsored program consisted of diabetes self-management education and support, medical nutrition therapy and antihyperglycemic medications management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsFrom March 2019 to July 2021, adult DBC completers with Medicare or a health system Medicaid or employee commercial plan were enrolled in BC-Plus for 9 months. DBC completers not meeting insurance eligibility or who declined to participate in BC-Plus acted as controls. During the first 3 months, BC-Plus participants received ongoing daily remote blood glucose (BG) monitoring; and during all 9 months, they received monthly check-in calls with BG review by a medical assistant who addressed needs for supplies/drugs, whether participants were checking BGs, and self-care encouragement. Escalation to a nurse practitioner occurred if the monthly BG trend was >200 mg/dL and/or several BG <80 mg/dL and/or new A1C >9.0% were identified. A1C was followed for an additional 9 months post-BC-Plus. A longitudinal mixed effects analysis was used to assess change in A1C from month 0 to month 21 of follow-up between BC-Plus participants versus controls.
resultsA total of 838 DCM completers were identified, among whom 281 joined the BC-Plus intervention and 557 acted as controls. Mean age was 55.9 years; 58.2% were women; 66.2% were black; and 30.6% insured by Medicare. BC-Plus participants experienced significantly lower A1C compared with controls and remained below 8.0% to month 18.
conclusionsAmong completers of a 3-month DCM program, a low intensity 9-month sustaining strategy maintained A1C under 8.0% (HEDIS (Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set) threshold for diabetes control) compared with controls for 15 months after completion of the initial DCM intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.