Evidence mapPaperPMID 38472626Full record

ReviewDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2024

Expert Opinion on Current Trends in the Use of Insulin in the Management of People with Type 2 Diabetes from the South-Eastern European Region and Israel.

Adam G Tabak, Peter Kempler, Cristian Guja, Roy Eldor, Martin Haluzik, Tomasz Klupa, Nikolaos Papanas, Anca Pantea Stoian, Boris Mankovsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Use of Fixed Ratio Combinations to Improve Glycemic Control in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: Experts' Opinion from the Gulf Region.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adam G TabakDepartment of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 2/a Korányi S. Str., 1083, Budapest, Hungary. a.tabak@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6234-3936
Peter KemplerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 2/a Korányi S. Str., 1083, Budapest, Hungary.
Cristian GujaDepartment of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Disease, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Roy EldorDiabetes Unit, Institute of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Hypertension, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Martin HaluzikDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomasz KlupaCenter for Advanced Technologies in Diabetes & Department of Metabolic Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Nikolaos PapanasSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes Centre, Diabetic Foot Clinic, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Anca Pantea StoianDepartment of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Disease, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Boris MankovskyDepartment of Diabetology, National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of various antihyperglycaemic therapies and comprehensive guidelines, glycaemic control in diabetes management has not improved significantly during the last decade in the real-world clinical setting. Treatment inertia arising from a complex interplay among patient-, clinician- and healthcare-system-related factors is the prime reason for this suboptimal glycaemic control. Also, the key factor leading to inadequate glycaemic levels remains limited communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D). Early insulin administration has several advantages including reduced glucotoxicity, high efficacy and preserved β-cell mass/function, leading to lowering the risk of diabetes complications. The current publication is based on consensus of experts from the South-Eastern European region and Israel who reviewed the existing evidence and guidelines for the treatment of PwT2D. Herein, the experts emphasised the timely use of insulin, preferably second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues and intensification using basal-plus therapy, as the most-potent glucose-lowering treatment choice in the real-world clinical setting. Despite an increase in the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), the experts urged timely insulin initiation for inadequate glycaemic control in PwT2D. Furthermore, the combination of BI and GLP-1 RA addressing both fasting plasma glucose and post-prandial excursions as a free- or fixed-ratio combination was identified to reduce treatment complexity and burden. To minimise discontinuation and improve adherence, the experts reiterated quality, regular interactions and discussions between HCPs and PwT2D/carers for their involvement in the diabetes management decision-making process. Clinicians and HCPs should consider the opinions of the experts in accordance with the most recent recommendations for diabetes management.

Indexed as

Clinical practiceInsulin initiationIntensificationIsraelSouth-Eastern European regionTitrationType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID38472626
PMCPMC11043254

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.