ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Pediatric Chest Pain: A Review of Diagnostic Tools in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paediatric chest pain: evaluating diagnostic testing and clinical outcomes.BMC pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Review
- Monitoring Beta-Blocker Therapy in Adolescents with Exercise-Induced Intraventricular Gradients Using Exercise Stress Echocardiography.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Multi-Modality Imaging in Coronary Anomalies: Focus on Anomalous Aortic Origin of Coronary Arteries.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Reply to Cotrim, N.; Cotrim, C. Is It Wise to Forget Exercise Stress Echocardiography in the Study of Chest Pain in Children? Comment on "Huang, S.-W.; Liu, Y.-K. Pediatric Chest Pain: A Review of Diagnostic Tools in the Pediatric Emergency Department.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Is It Wise to Forget Exercise Stress Echocardiography in the Study of Chest Pain in Children? Comment on Huang, S.-W.; Liu, Y.-K. Pediatric Chest Pain: A Review of Diagnostic Tools in the Pediatric Emergency Department.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Particular Aspects of Cardiac Rhythm Disorders in Pediatric Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating nociplastic pain into neuropathic pain framework: a proposal for a revised classification.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Approaches to Pediatric Chest Pain: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric chest pain is a common chief complaint in the emergency department. Not surprisingly, children with chest pain are usually brought to the emergency department by their parents out of fear of heart disease. However, chest pain in the pediatric population is generally a benign disease. In this review, we have identified musculoskeletal pain as the most prevalent etiology of chest pain in the pediatric population, accounting for 38.7-86.3% of cases, followed by pulmonary (1.8-12.8%), gastrointestinal (0.3-9.3%), psychogenic (5.1-83.6%), and cardiac chest pain (0.3-8.0%). Various diagnostic procedures are commonly used in the emergency department for cardiac chest pain, including electrocardiogram (ECG), chest radiography, cardiac troponin examination, and echocardiography. However, these examinations demonstrate limited sensitivity in identifying cardiac etiologies, with sensitivities ranging from 0 to 17.8% for ECG and 11.0 to 17.2% for chest radiography. To avoid the overuse of these diagnostic tools, a well-designed standardized algorithm for pediatric chest pain could decrease unnecessary examination without missing severe diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.