Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38473266›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Outcomes of Late-Line Systemic Treatment in GIST: Does Sequence Matter?

Prapassorn Thirasastr, Thomas L Sutton, Cissimol P Joseph, Heather Lin, Behrang Amini, Skye C Mayo, Dejka Araujo, Robert S Benjamin, Anthony P Conley, John A Livingston and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prapassorn ThirasastrDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0463-1435
Thomas L SuttonDivision of Surgical Oncology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-7154
Cissimol P JosephDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Heather LinDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Behrang AminiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Skye C MayoDivision of Surgical Oncology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1631-9855
Dejka AraujoDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Robert S BenjaminDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Anthony P ConleyDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
John A LivingstonDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1337-3282
Joseph LudwigDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Shreyaskumar PatelDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Ravin RatanDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Vinod RaviDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Maria A ZarzourDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Elise F Nassif HaddadDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3794-6759
Michael S NakazawaDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Xiao ZhouDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Michael C HeinrichCell and Developmental Biology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Neeta SomaiahDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Novel models for functional profiling of germline SDH variants associated with cancerR21CA263400 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HEINRICH, MICHAEL C · 2021 to 2022
$320k
Functional profiling of germline SDH variants associated with cancer susceptibilityI01BX005358 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEINRICH, MICHAEL C · 2021 to 2025
–
BLRD VA I01 BX005358NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R21 CA263400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ripretinib and avapritinib have demonstrated activity in the late-line treatment of gastrointestinal stomal tumors (GISTs). We investigated whether patients previously treated with ripretinib benefit from avapritinib, and vice versa. Patients diagnosed with metastatic/unresectable GIST and treated with both drugs at two institutions in 2000-2021 were included. Patients were grouped by drug sequence: ripretinib-avapritinib (RA) or avapritinib-ripretinib (AR). Radiographic response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-four patients (17 per group) were identified, with a median age of 48 years. The most common primary site was the small bowel (17/34, 50%), followed by the stomach (10/34, 29.4%). Baseline characteristics and tumor mutations were not significantly different between groups. Response rates (RRs) for ripretinib were 18% for RA and 12% for AR; RRs for avapritinib were 12% for AR and 18% for RA. Median TTPs for ripretinib were 3.65 months (95%CI 2-5.95) for RA and 4.73 months (1.87-15.84) for AR. Median TTPs for avapritinib were 5.39 months (2.86-18.99) for AR and 4.11 months (1.91-11.4) for RA. Median OS rates following RA or AR initiation were 29.63 (95%CI 13.8-50.53) and 33.7 (20.03-50.57) months, respectively. Both ripretinib and avapritinib were efficacious in the late-line treatment of GIST, with no evidence that efficacy depended on sequencing.

Indexed as

avapritinibgastrointestinal stomal tumorripretinib

Identifiers

PMID38473266
PMCPMC10931337
OpenAlexW4392096701

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.