Evidence mapPaperPMID 38474254Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Ana Isabel Beltrán-Velasco, Manuel Reiriz, Sara Uceda, Víctor Echeverry-Alzate

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nutrients · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Nutrients · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Isabel Beltrán-VelascoPsychology Department, School of Life and Nature Sciences, Nebrija University, 28240 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9893-0227
Manuel ReirizPsychology Department, School of Life and Nature Sciences, Nebrija University, 28240 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-0065
Sara UcedaPsychology Department, School of Life and Nature Sciences, Nebrija University, 28240 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1467-5186
Víctor Echeverry-AlzatePsychology Department, School of Life and Nature Sciences, Nebrija University, 28240 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9059-3513
Universidad Nebrija · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review addresses the use of

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesProbioticsAnimalsComplementary TherapiesDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansLactiplantibacillus plantarumAlzheimer’s diseaseLactiplantibacillus plantarumLactobacillus plantarumMultiple Sclerosisneurodegenerative diseaseneurodegenerative processParkinson’s diseaseprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID38474254
PMCPMC10931784
OpenAlexW4392471339

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.