Evidence mapPaperPMID 38476203Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2024

Randomized Double-Blinded Comparison of Intermittent Boluses Phenylephrine and Norepinephrine for the Treatment of Postspinal Hypotension in Patients with Severe Pre-Eclampsia During Cesarean Section.

Zheng-Bin Pan, Zhi-Min Sheng, Miao Zhu, Zhong Mei, Yan-Ping Shen, Jin-Ping Liu, Xiao-Wei Qian

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zheng-Bin PanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Min ShengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3806-9620
Miao ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0003-7636-7984
Zhong MeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-0593
Yan-Ping ShenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Ping LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Wei QianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CNShaoxing City Women and Children Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Norepinephrine has fewer negative effects on heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) for treating postspinal hypotension (PSH) compared with phenylephrine during cesarean section. However, it remains unclear whether fetuses from patients with severe pre-eclampsia could benefit from the superiority of CO. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of intermittent intravenous boluses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine used in equipotent doses for treating postspinal hypotension in patients with severe pre-eclampsia during cesarean section. Methods: A total of 80 patients with severe pre-eclampsia who developed PSH predelivery during cesarean section were included. Eligible patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either phenylephrine or norepinephrine for treating PSH. The primary outcome was umbilical arterial pH. Secondary outcomes included other umbilical cord blood gas values, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, changes in hemodynamic parameters including CO, mean arterial pressure (MAP), HR, stroke volume (SV), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR), the number of vasopressor boluses required, and the incidence of bradycardia, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. Results: No significant difference was observed in umbilical arterial pH between the phenylephrine and norepinephrine groups (7.303±0.38 vs 7.303±0.44, respectively; P=0.978). Compared with the phenylephrine group, the overall CO (P=0.009) and HR (P=0.015) were greater in the norepinephrine group. The median [IQR] total number of vasopressor boluses required was comparable between the two groups (2 [1 to 3] and 2 [1 to 3], respectively; P=0.942). No significant difference was found in Apgar scores or the incidence of maternal complications between groups. Conclusion: A 60 µg bolus of phenylephrine and a 4.5 µg bolus of norepinephrine showed similar neonatal outcomes assessed by umbilical arterial pH and were equally effective when treating PSH during cesarean section in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. Norepinephrine provided a higher maternal CO and a lower incidence of bradycardia.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalCesarean SectionHypotensionPre-EclampsiaBradycardiaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNorepinephrinePhenylephrinePregnancyVasoconstrictor AgentsNorepinephrinePhenylephrineVasoconstrictor Agentshypotensionnorepinephrinephenylephrineumbilical arterial pH

Identifiers

PMID38476203
PMCPMC10927372
OpenAlexW4392301951

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.