Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477609›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2024

Effects of Behavioral, Clinical, and Policy Interventions in Reducing Human Exposure to Bisphenols and Phthalates: A Scoping Review.

Nicole E Sieck, Meg Bruening, Irene van Woerden, Corrie Whisner, Devon C Payne-Sturges

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Endocrine disruptors and children's health.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms underlying sex differences in autoimmunity.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole E SieckInstitute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Meg BrueningDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Irene van WoerdenDepartment of Community and Public Health, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA.
Corrie WhisnerCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Devon C Payne-SturgesInstitute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7343-2814
University of Maryland, College Park · USArizona State University · USIdaho State University · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing interest in evidence-based interventions, programs, and policies to mitigate exposures to bisphenols and phthalates and in using implementation science frameworks to evaluate hypotheses regarding the importance of specific approaches to individual or household behavior change or institutions adopting interventions.

objectivesThis scoping review aimed to identify, categorize, and summarize the effects of behavioral, clinical, and policy interventions focused on exposure to the most widely used and studied bisphenols [bisphenol A (BPA), bisphenol S (BPS), and bisphenol F (BPF)] and phthalates with an implementation science lens.

methodsA comprehensive search of all individual behavior, clinical, and policy interventions to reduce exposure to bisphenols and phthalates was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Google Scholar. We included studies published between January 2000 and November 2022. Two reviewers screened references in CADIMA, then extracted data (population characteristics, intervention design, chemicals assessed, and outcomes) for studies meeting inclusion criteria for the present review.

resultsA total of 58 interventions met the inclusion criteria. We classified interventions as dietary ( DISCUSSION: Studies evaluating policy interventions that targeted the reduction of phthalates and BPA in goods and packaging showed widespread, long-term impact on decreasing exposure to bisphenols and phthalates. Clinical interventions removing bisphenol and phthalate materials from medical devices and equipment showed overall reductions in exposure biomarkers. Dietary interventions tended to lower exposure with the greatest magnitude of effect in trials where fresh foods were provided to participants. The lower exposure reductions observed in pragmatic nutrition education trials and the lack of diversity (sociodemographic backgrounds) present limitations for generalizability to all populations. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11760.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposurePhenolsPhthalic AcidsBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsBisphenol S CompoundsEnvironmental PollutantsHumansSulfonesBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A Compoundsbisphenol SBisphenol S CompoundsEnvironmental PollutantsPhenolsphthalic acidPhthalic AcidsSulfones

Identifiers

PMID38477609
PMCPMC10936218
OpenAlexW4392779429

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.