Trial reportScientific reports2024
Timing of first abdominal operation in Crohn's disease based on a diagnostic model.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenteric and antimesenteric border subregionalization using MR enterography: advancing fibrosis evaluation in Crohn disease.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Predictors of anti-TNF treatment failure in intestinal Behçet's disease: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota and mesenteric adipose tissue interactions in shaping phenotypes and treatment strategies for Crohn's disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop a clinical diagnostic model for assessing the need for initial abdominal surgery in patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) and create a nomogram to facilitate clinical decision-making. A total of 164 surgical CD patients and 230 control CD patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression and binomial logistic regression were employed to select clinical variables. The 394 CD patients were randomly allocated to a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. The filtered variables were used to establish a diagnostic model and nomogram in the training set, subsequently validated in the testing set. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve were constructed to validate the clinical applicability of the model. Binomial logistic regression analysis identified seven clinical variables with a p-value less than 0.01, including Biomarker (B), Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR), Intestinal obstruction, Albumin (ALB), Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Myocardial Flow Index (MFI), and C-reactive protein (CRP). These variables were utilized to establish the diagnostic model. Calibration curves showed good alignment, with a C-index of 0.996 in the training set and 0.990 in the testing set. DCA and clinical impact curve demonstrated that the diagnostic model had good clinical efficiency and could provide clinical benefits. A validated diagnostic model for determining the timing of the first abdominal operation in CD patients was established and evaluated, showing high discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical efficiency. It can be utilized by clinicians to assess the optimal timing for transitioning CD patients from medical treatment to surgical intervention, providing valuable references for individualized treatment decisions for CD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.