Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482107›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2024

Feasibility of a Self-directed Upper Extremity Training Program to Promote Actual Arm Use for Individuals Living in the Community With Chronic Stroke.

Grace J Kim, Amanda Gahlot, Camile Magsombol, Margaret Waskiewicz, Nettie Capasso, Stephen Van Lew, Hayejin Kim, Avinash Parnandi, Victoria Vaughan Dickson, Yael Goverover

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Grace J KimDepartment of Occupational Therapy, NYU Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York, NY.
Amanda GahlotDepartment of Occupational Therapy, NYU Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York, NY.
Camile MagsombolDepartment of Occupational Therapy, NYU Langone Health, Rusk Rehabilitation, New York, NY.
Margaret WaskiewiczDepartment of Occupational Therapy, NYU Langone Health, Rusk Rehabilitation, New York, NY.
Nettie CapassoDepartment of Occupational Therapy, NYU Langone Health, Rusk Rehabilitation, New York, NY.
Stephen Van LewDepartment of Occupational Therapy, NYU Langone Health, Rusk Rehabilitation, New York, NY.
Hayejin KimDepartment of Occupational Therapy, NYU Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York, NY.
Avinash ParnandiDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Victoria Vaughan DicksonNYU Meyers Pless Center for Nursing Research, New York, NY.
Yael GoveroverDepartment of Occupational Therapy, NYU Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York, NY.
Rusk Rehabilitation · USKessler Foundation · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the feasibility of a self-directed training protocol to promote actual arm use in everyday life. The secondary aim was to explore the initial efficacy on upper extremity (UE) outcome measures. Design: Feasibility study using multiple methods. Setting: Home and outpatient research lab. Participants: Fifteen adults (6 women, 9 men, mean age=53.08 years) with chronic stroke living in the community. There was wide range of UE functional levels, ranging from dependent stabilizer (limited function) to functional assist (high function). Intervention: Use My Arm-Remote protocol. Phase 1 consisted of clinician training on motivational interviewing (MI). Phase 2 consisted of MI sessions with participants to determine participant generated goals, training activities, and training schedules. Phase 3 consisted of UE task-oriented training (60 minutes/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks). Participants received daily surveys through an app to monitor arm training behavior and weekly virtual check-ins with clinicians to problem-solve challenges and adjust treatment plans. Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measures were feasibility domains after intervention, measured by quantitative study data and qualitative semi-structured interviews. Secondary outcomes included the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Motor Activity Log (MAL), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and accelerometry-based duration of use metric measured at baseline, discharge, and 4-week follow-up. Results: The UMA-R was feasible in the following domains: recruitment rate, retention rate, intervention acceptance, intervention delivery, adherence frequency, and safety. Adherence to duration of daily practice did not meet our criteria. Improvements in UE outcomes were achieved at discharge and maintained at follow-up as measured by COPM-Performance subscale (F[1.42, 19.83]=17.72, Conclusion: The UMA-R was feasible and safe to implement for individuals living in the community with chronic stroke. Adherence duration was identified as area of refinement. Participants demonstrated improvements in standardized UE outcomes to support initial efficacy of the UMA-R. Shared decision-making and behavior change frameworks can support the implementation of UE self-directed rehabilitation. Our results warrant the refinement and further testing of the UMA-R.

Indexed as

Actual arm useSelf-directed trainingShared decision-makingStrokeUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID38482107
PMCPMC10928291
OpenAlexW4391014520

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.