ArticleScientific reports2024
A multi-source molecular network representation model for protein-protein interactions prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing edge-based clustering and graph embedding for biological network analysis: a case study in RASopathies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Recent advances in deep learning for protein-protein interaction: a review.BioData mining · 2025Review
- Machine learning approaches for predicting craniofacial anomalies with graph neural networks.Computational biology and chemistry · 2025Article
- Network pharmacology and AI in cancer research uncovering biomarkers and therapeutic targets for RALGDS mutations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prediction of potential protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is a critical step in decoding diseases and understanding cellular mechanisms. Traditional biological experiments have identified plenty of potential PPIs in recent years, but this problem is still far from being solved. Hence, there is urgent to develop computational models with good performance and high efficiency to predict potential PPIs. In this study, we propose a multi-source molecular network representation learning model (called MultiPPIs) to predict potential protein-protein interactions. Specifically, we first extract the protein sequence features according to the physicochemical properties of amino acids by utilizing the auto covariance method. Second, a multi-source association network is constructed by integrating the known associations among miRNAs, proteins, lncRNAs, drugs, and diseases. The graph representation learning method, DeepWalk, is adopted to extract the multisource association information of proteins with other biomolecules. In this way, the known protein-protein interaction pairs can be represented as a concatenation of the protein sequence and the multi-source association features of proteins. Finally, the Random Forest classifier and corresponding optimal parameters are used for training and prediction. In the results, MultiPPIs obtains an average 86.03% prediction accuracy with 82.69% sensitivity at the AUC of 93.03% under five-fold cross-validation. The experimental results indicate that MultiPPIs has a good prediction performance and provides valuable insights into the field of potential protein-protein interactions prediction. MultiPPIs is free available at https://github.com/jiboyalab/multiPPIs .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.