Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38488833›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Pharmacy Students' Attitudes Toward Distance Learning After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia.

Saud Alsahali, Salman Almutairi, Salem Almutairi, Saleh Almofadhi, Mohammed Anaam, Mohammed Alshammari, Suhaj Abdulsalim, Yasser Almogbel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saud Alsahali *Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6048-0702
Salman Almutairi *Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2967-7926
Salem Almutairi *Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7654-910X
Saleh Almofadhi *Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8448-2199
Mohammed Anaam *Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2376-1067
Mohammed Alshammari *Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3423-6199
Suhaj Abdulsalim *Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6450-9848
Yasser Almogbel *Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0155-6986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic learning refers to the use of assistive tools in offline and distance learning environments. It allows students to access learning tools and materials anytime and anywhere. However, distance learning courses depend on several factors that affect the quality of learning, which consequently affect students' preferences in the settings and tools used to deliver educational materials.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate students' preferences for continuing distance learning after the pandemic and to assess the distance educational environment after the pandemic. It also aimed to identify the factors affecting distance learning and evaluate students' preferences regarding modes of communication with instructors.

methodsA web-based survey was used to conduct this cross-sectional study. The target participants of this study were students in the doctor of pharmacy program at Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim, Saudi Arabia. All students enrolled from December 2022 to January 2023 received an invitation with a link to the web-based survey.

resultsThe survey was completed by 141 students (58 female students and 83 male students). The research results showed that most students (102/141, 72.3%) did not wish to continue distance education for laboratory courses, and 60.3% (85/141) did not wish to continue taking distance team-based learning after the pandemic. Additionally, 83.7% (118/141) of the students indicated that distance courses were simple. More than half of the participants (79/141, 56%) stated that having a camera on during class negatively impacted their learning, and only 29.1% (41/141) of the students stated that nonvisual communication with their fellow students impacted their learning. A large proportion of students (83/141, 58.9%) reported impairment of social engagement on campus, 44% (62/141) in-person interactions during classes, and 73.7% (104/141) were relieved that their classes were not disrupted.

conclusionsSimilar to all types of education, distance learning is characterized by advantages and disadvantages, as reported by students. Students felt that the course material was intelligible, and the distance course was uncomplicated. Moreover, they expressed relief that their studies were not disrupted. However, they also reported the loss of face-to-face contact during courses as the most significant drawback of distance learning versus face-to-face learning, followed by a lack of social connection on campus.

Indexed as

distance learningeducational experience.e-learningpharmacy educationteam based learning

Identifiers

PMID38488833
PMCPMC10980985

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.