ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
The influence of socioeconomic status and gender on incidence and survival in bladder cancer: a longitudinal study based on the Hamburg Cancer Registry.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social inequalities in cancer in Germany: a call to action.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Socioeconomic disparities and bladder cancer stage at diagnosis: a statewide cohort analysis.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic disparities and MIBC survival outcome-An analysis of a statewide cohort.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Gender difference of bladder cancer: insights from hormone, anatomy and tumor microenvironment.World journal of urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) and gender on the incidence and survival of patients with bladder cancer on a small scale within the city of Hamburg, Germany.
methodsPatients documented in the Hamburg Cancer Registry aged ≥ 18 years with primary bladder carcinoma (ICD-10: C67, D09.0), diagnosed in the period 2004-2020 (follow-up until 31.12.2021), and residing in Hamburg were included. The patients were divided into three groups (low, intermediate, and high SES) based on the socioeconomic situation at the district level, defined by the proportion of unemployed individuals, social housing, benefit recipients according to law, etc. Relative survival in the years 2004-2020 was calculated using a period approach.
resultsAmong the 10,659 patients included, age-standardized 5-year relative survival (5YRS) in 2004-2020 correlated with SES. The age-standardized 5YRS differed significantly between patients with high and intermediate SES vs low SES. Women with low SES had the worst 5YRS at 58.2%, while men with high SES presented the best relative 5YRS at 73.5%. This effect remained after stratification by UICC stages. Concerning incidence, there is an indication that women with low SES were more often diagnosed in higher UICC stages III or IV than women with high SES (18.3% versus 12.6%).
conclusionsThe socioeconomic situation at the time of diagnosis, as well as gender, has a substantial impact on the incidence and cancer survival rates in patients with bladder cancer. Further research, including the study of patient care, is needed to better understand and address these inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38492172What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.