Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38496570›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models.

Gilberto Gonzalez-Parra, Md Shahriar Mahmud, Claus Kadelka

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gilberto Gonzalez-ParraInstituto de Matemática Multidisciplinar, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5847-678X
Md Shahriar MahmudDepartment of Mathematics, Iowa State University, 411 Morrill Rd, Ames, 50011, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0547-5617
Claus KadelkaDepartment of Mathematics, Iowa State University, 411 Morrill Rd, Ames, 50011, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5712-8529

Funding

NM-INBRE Sequencing and Bioinformatics CoreP20GM103451 · NIGMS · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI SHELLEY LUSETTI · 2012 to 2026
$61.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the world becomes ever more connected, the chance of pandemics increases as well. The recent COVID-19 pandemic and the concurrent global mass vaccine roll-out provides an ideal setting to learn from and refine our understanding of infectious disease models for better future preparedness. In this review, we systematically analyze and categorize mathematical models that have been developed to design optimal vaccine prioritization strategies of an initially limited vaccine. As older individuals are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, the focus is on models that take age explicitly into account. The lower mobility and activity level of older individuals gives rise to non-trivial trade-offs. Secondary research questions concern the optimal time interval between vaccine doses and spatial vaccine distribution. This review showcases the effect of various modeling assumptions on model outcomes. A solid understanding of these relationships yields better infectious disease models and thus public health decisions during the next pandemic.

Indexed as

ageCOVID-19mathematical modelReviewvaccine allocationvaccine roll-out

Identifiers

PMID38496570
PMCPMC10942533

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.