Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38499607›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acid protein levels are elevated in post-mild COVID-19 or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases.

Domenico Plantone, Angela Stufano, Delia Righi, Sara Locci, Ivo Iavicoli, Piero Lovreglio, Nicola De Stefano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of TDP-43, NfL, and GFAP in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in Alzheimer's disease.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Domenico Plantone *Department of Medicine, Surgery, Neuroscience University of Siena, Siena, Italy. domenico.plantone@unisi.it.
Angela Stufano *Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Delia RighiDepartment of Medicine, Surgery, Neuroscience University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Sara LocciDepartment of Medicine, Surgery, Neuroscience University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Ivo IavicoliDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Piero LovreglioDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Nicola De StefanoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery, Neuroscience University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the huge impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, it appears of paramount importance to assess the cognitive effects on the population returning to work after COVID-19 resolution. Serum levels of neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) represent promising biomarkers of neuro-axonal damage and astrocytic activation. In this cohort study, we explored the association between sNfL and sGFAP concentrations and cognitive performance in a group of 147 adult workers with a previous asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19, one week and, in 49 of them, ten months after SARS-Cov2 negativization and compared them to a group of 82 age and BMI-matched healthy controls (HCs). sNfL and sGFAP concentrations were assessed using SimoaTM assay Neurology 2-Plex B Kit. COVID-19 patients were interviewed one-on-one by trained physicians and had to complete a list of questionnaires, including the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ). At the first assessment (T0), sNfL and sGFAP levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients than in HCs (p < 0.001 for both). The eleven COVID-19 patients with cognitive impairment had significantly higher levels of sNfL and sGFAP than the others (p = 0.005 for both). At the subsequent follow-up (T1), sNfL and sGFAP levels showed a significant decrease (median sNfL 18.3 pg/mL; median sGFAP 77.2 pg/mL), although they were still higher than HCs (median sNfL 7.2 pg/mL, median sGFAP 63.5 pg/mL). Our results suggest an ongoing damage involving neurons and astrocytes after SARS-Cov2 negativization, which reduce after ten months even if still evident compared to HCs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisAdultBiomarkersCohort StudiesGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansIntermediate FilamentsNeurofilament ProteinsPandemicsRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2BiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinNeurofilament ProteinsRNA, ViralCognitionCOVID-19Glial fibrillary acidic proteinNeurofilament light chainOccupational riskSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38499607
PMCPMC10948776
OpenAlexW4392922112

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.