Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38501488›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024

A cellulosomal double-dockerin module from Clostridium thermocellum shows distinct structural and cohesin-binding features.

Chao Chen, Hongwu Yang, Sheng Dong, Cai You, Sarah Moraïs, Edward A Bayer, Ya-Jun Liu, Jinsong Xuan, Qiu Cui, Itzhak Mizrahi and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chao ChenCAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Hongwu YangCAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Sheng DongCAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Cai YouCAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Sarah MoraïsDepartment of Life Sciences and the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Edward A BayerDepartment of Life Sciences and the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Ya-Jun LiuCAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Jinsong XuanDepartment of Biological Science and Engineering, School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Qiu CuiCAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Itzhak MizrahiDepartment of Life Sciences and the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Yingang FengCAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0879-1316
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILBeijing Information Science & Technology University · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities FRF-DF-20-09Major Education and Teaching Reform Research Project JG2021ZD01National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC3402300National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070028National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070125National Natural Science Foundation of China 32170051National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171203National Natural Science Foundation of China 32200030QIBEBT International Cooperation Project ICP202304Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2016CB09State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology Open Projects Fund M2022-01Training Program for Young Teaching Backbone Talents 2302020JXGGRC-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulosomes are intricate cellulose-degrading multi-enzymatic complexes produced by anaerobic bacteria, which are valuable for bioenergy development and biotechnology. Cellulosome assembly relies on the selective interaction between cohesin modules in structural scaffolding proteins (scaffoldins) and dockerin modules in enzymes. Although the number of tandem cohesins in the scaffoldins is believed to determine the complexity of the cellulosomes, tandem dockerins also exist, albeit very rare, in some cellulosomal components whose assembly and functional roles are currently unclear. In this study, we characterized the structure and mode of assembly of a tandem bimodular double-dockerin, which is connected to a putative S8 protease in the cellulosome-producing bacterium, Clostridium thermocellum. Crystal and NMR structures of the double-dockerin revealed two typical type I dockerin folds with significant interactions between them. Interaction analysis by isothermal titration calorimetry and NMR titration experiments revealed that the double-dockerin displays a preference for binding to the cell-wall anchoring scaffoldin ScaD through the first dockerin with a canonical dual-binding mode, while the second dockerin module was unable to bind to any of the tested cohesins. Surprisingly, the double-dockerin showed a much higher affinity to a cohesin from the CipC scaffoldin of Clostridium cellulolyticum than to the resident cohesins from C. thermocellum. These results contribute valuable insights into the structure and assembly of the double-dockerin module, and provide the basis for further functional studies on multiple-dockerin modules and cellulosomal proteases, thus highlighting the complexity and diversity of cellulosomal components.

Indexed as

Acetivibrio thermocellusCohesinsBacterial ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneMultienzyme ComplexesBacterial ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsMultienzyme Complexesbinding affinityNMRprotein complexprotein-protein interactionscaffolding proteintandem modulesX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID38501488
PMCPMC10949318
OpenAlexW4392956783

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.