Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38501786›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2024

Influence of age on the efficacy of pharmacologic treatments on fracture risk reduction and increases in BMD: RCT results from the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE project.

Marian Schini, Tatiane Vilaca, Eric Vittinghoff, Li-Yung Lui, Susan K Ewing, Austin R Thompson, Douglas C Bauer, Mary L Bouxsein, Dennis M Black, Richard Eastell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A randomised Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed denosumab biosimilar RGB-14-P and reference denosumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
  3. Effectiveness of treatment initiation for secondary fracture prevention in the older population: Japanese Bone-fracture Osteoporosis in Late-stage population Database study (J-BOLD) - emulation of a randomized target trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Revised Swedish FRAX models and the establishment of age-dependent intervention thresholds.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marian SchiniDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
Tatiane VilacaDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9227-6076
Eric VittinghoffDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Li-Yung LuiCalifornia Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Susan K EwingDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Austin R ThompsonDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Douglas C BauerDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Mary L BouxseinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215330, United States.
Dennis M BlackDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Richard EastellDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-3366
University of California, San Francisco · USGlasgow Centre for Population Health · GBBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · US

Funding

DDTBMQ000054: Regulatory qualification for DXA bone mineral density as a surrogate endpoint for fracture risk in osteoporosis trialsU01FD007772 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BLACK, DENNIS M · 2022 to 2022
$226k
American Society for Bone Mineral ResearchFDA HHS 1U01FD007772-01FDA HHS U01 FD007772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a common belief that antiosteoporosis medications are less effective in older adults. This study used data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of treatments and their effects on BMD differ in people ≥70 compared to those <70 yr. We used individual patient data from 23 RCTs of osteoporosis medications collected as part of the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project. We assessed the following fractures: radiographic vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, all clinical, and all fractures. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate treatment effect for clinical fracture outcomes, logistic regression for the radiographic vertebral fracture outcome, and linear regression to estimate treatment effect on 24-mo change in hip and spine BMD in each age subgroup. The analysis included 123 164 (99% female) participants; 43% being ≥70 yr. Treatment with anti-osteoporosis drugs significantly and similarly reduced fractures in both subgroups (eg, odds ratio [OR] = 0.47 and 0.51 for vertebral fractures in those below and above 70 yr, interaction P = .19; hazard ratio [HR] for all fractures: 0.72 vs 0.70, interaction P = .20). Results were similar when limited to bisphosphonate trials with the exception of hip fracture risk reduction which was somewhat greater in those <70 (HR = 0.44) vs ≥70 (HR = 0.79) yr (interaction P = .02). Allocation to anti-osteoporotic drugs resulted in significantly greater increases in hip and spine BMD at 24 mo in those ≥70 compared to those <70 yr. In summary, anti-osteoporotic medications similarly reduced the risk of fractures regardless of age, and the few small differences in fracture risk reduction by age were of uncertain clinical significance.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBone Density Conservation AgentsFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsagebisphosphonatesBMDosteoporosisSABREtreatment

Identifiers

PMID38501786
PMCPMC11262139
OpenAlexW4392934780

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.