Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38505224›Full record

ReviewBiophysics reviews2022

Intrinsically disordered proteins: Ensembles at the limits of Anfinsen's dogma.

Prakash Kulkarni, Vitor B P Leite, Susmita Roy, Supriyo Bhattacharyya, Atish Mohanty, Srisairam Achuthan, Divyoj Singh, Rajeswari Appadurai, Govindan Rangarajan, Keith Weninger and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysics reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. PEG-mCherry interactions beyond classical macromolecular crowding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Analysis of proteins in the light of mutations.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Big versus small: The impact of aggregate size in disease.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Prakash KulkarniDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California 91010, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3285-197X
Vitor B P LeiteDepartamento de Física, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo 15054-000, Brazil.
Susmita RoyDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, West Bengal 741246, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6411-4347
Supriyo BhattacharyyaTranslational Bioinformatics, Center for Informatics, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
Atish MohantyDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
Srisairam AchuthanCenter for Informatics, Division of Research Informatics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
Divyoj SinghCenter for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1552-2701
Rajeswari AppaduraiMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-868X
Govindan RangarajanDepartment of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Keith WeningerDepartment of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.
John Orban
Anand SrivastavaMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-1511
Mohit Kumar JollyCenter for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6631-2109
Jose N OnuchicCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005-1892, USA.
Ravi SalgiaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
City Of Hope National Medical Center · USIndian Institute of Science Bangalore · INAdvanced Bioscience Laboratories (United States) · USCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics · USIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata · INNorth Carolina State University · USUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Engineering protein-specific proteases: targeting signaling proteinsR01GM141290 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI ORBAN, JOHN, TOTH, ERIC A · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/E/18/1/504308NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are proteins that lack rigid 3D structure. Hence, they are often misconceived to present a challenge to Anfinsen's dogma. However, IDPs exist as ensembles that sample a quasi-continuum of rapidly interconverting conformations and, as such, may represent proteins at the extreme limit of the Anfinsen postulate. IDPs play important biological roles and are key components of the cellular protein interaction network (PIN). Many IDPs can interconvert between disordered and ordered states as they bind to appropriate partners. Conformational dynamics of IDPs contribute to conformational noise in the cell. Thus, the dysregulation of IDPs contributes to increased noise and "promiscuous" interactions. This leads to PIN rewiring to output an appropriate response underscoring the critical role of IDPs in cellular decision making. Nonetheless, IDPs are not easily tractable experimentally. Furthermore, in the absence of a reference conformation, discerning the energy landscape representation of the weakly funneled IDPs in terms of reaction coordinates is challenging. To understand conformational dynamics in real time and decipher how IDPs recognize multiple binding partners with high specificity, several sophisticated knowledge-based and physics-based

Identifiers

PMID38505224
PMCPMC10903413
OpenAlexW4220973532

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.