ArticleLa Radiologia medica2024
Computed tomography-based 3D convolutional neural network deep learning model for predicting micropapillary or solid growth pattern of invasive lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of SHAP visualization and nomogram based on PET/CT radiomics combined models for risk stratification in high-grade invasive lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- An optimized EfficientNetB7 deep learning model for lung cancer tissue pathology image recognition.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive review of pulmonary embolism imaging: past, present and future innovations in computed tomography (CT) and other diagnostic techniques.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- AI Revolution in Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine: Transforming and Innovating the Radiological Sciences.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Enhancing the intraoperative identification of high-grade patterns in invasive lung adenocarcinoma via radiomics.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Preliminary Study on the Evaluation Value of Extracellular Volume Fraction in the Pathological Grading of Lung Invasive AdenocarcinomaCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based characterization of pathological subtypes in lung invasive adenocarcinoma utilizingBMC cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- An Update of AI and Radiomics in Precision Oncology: Insights from Liver Tumors as Case Models.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the value of a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning (DL) model to predict the presence of micropapillary or solid (M/S) growth pattern in invasive lung adenocarcinoma (ILADC). MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom June 2019 to October 2022, 617 patients with ILADC who underwent preoperative chest CT scans in our institution were randomly placed into training and internal validation sets in a 4:1 ratio, and 353 patients with ILADC from another institution were included as an external validation set. Then, a self-paced learning (SPL) 3D Net was used to establish two DL models: model 1 was used to predict the M/S growth pattern in ILADC, and model 2 was used to predict that pattern in ≤ 2-cm-diameter ILADC.
resultsFor model 1, the training cohort's area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score were 0.924, 0.845, 0.851, 0.842, and 0.843; the internal validation cohort's were 0.807, 0.744, 0.756, 0.750, and 0.743; and the external validation cohort's were 0.857, 0.805, 0.804, 0.806, and 0.804, respectively. For model 2, the training cohort's AUC, accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score were 0.946, 0.858, 0.881,0.844, and 0.851; the internal validation cohort's were 0.869, 0.809, 0.786, 0.794, and 0.790; and the external validation cohort's were 0.831, 0.792, 0.789, 0.790, and 0.790, respectively. The SPL 3D Net model performed better than the ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNeXt50, and DenseNet121 models.
conclusionThe CT-based DL model performed well as a noninvasive screening tool capable of reliably detecting and distinguishing the subtypes of ILADC, even in small-sized tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.