Evidence mapPaperPMID 38513367Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2024

High-intensity interval training combining rowing and cycling improves but does not restore beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes.

Maria Houborg Petersen, Jacob Volmer Stidsen, Martin Eisemann de Almeida, Emil Kleis Wentorf, Kurt Jensen, Niels Ørtenblad, Kurt Højlund

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03500016 (Metabolic and Molecular Abnormalities in Response to Insulin and Exercise in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03500016 nacompletednot on this map

Metabolic and Molecular Abnormalities in Response to Insulin and Exercise in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled48ConditionsType2 Diabetes, Insulin ResistanceArmsHigh intensity interval training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Houborg PetersenSteno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9502-1618
Jacob Volmer StidsenSteno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Martin Eisemann de AlmeidaSteno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1794-6137
Emil Kleis WentorfDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Kurt JensenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Niels ØrtenbladDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Kurt HøjlundSteno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0891-4224
Steno Diabetes Centers · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: We investigated whether a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocol could restore beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes compared with sedentary obese and lean individuals. Materials and methods: In patients with type 2 diabetes, and age-matched, glucose-tolerant obese and lean controls, we examined the effect of 8 weeks of supervised HIIT combining rowing and cycling on the acute (first-phase) and second-phase insulin responses, beta-cell function adjusted for insulin sensitivity (disposition index), and serum free fatty acid (FFA) levels using the Botnia clamp (1-h IVGTT followed by 3-h hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp). Results: At baseline, patients with type 2 diabetes had reduced insulin sensitivity (~40%), acute insulin secretion (~13-fold), and disposition index (>35-fold), whereas insulin-suppressed serum FFA was higher (⁓2.5-fold) compared with controls (all P < 0.05). The HIIT protocol increased insulin sensitivity in all groups (all P < 0.01). In patients with type 2 diabetes, this was accompanied by a large (>200%) but variable improvement in the disposition index (P < 0.05). Whereas insulin sensitivity improved to the degree seen in controls at baseline, the disposition index remained markedly lower in patients with type 2 diabetes after HIIT (all P < 0.001). In controls, HIIT increased the disposition index by ~20-30% (all P < 0.05). In all groups, the second-phase insulin responses and insulin-suppressed FFA levels were reduced in response to HIIT (all P < 0.05). No group differences were seen in these HIIT-induced responses. Conclusion: HIIT combining rowing and cycling induced a large but variable increase in beta-cell function adjusted for insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes, but the disposition index remained severely impaired compared to controls, suggesting that this defect is less reversible in response to exercise training than insulin resistance. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03500016).

Indexed as

beta-cell functionbotnia clamp (intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) and hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp)high-intensity interval training (HIIT)obesitytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID38513367
PMCPMC11046351
OpenAlexW4393097884

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.