Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38513625›Full record

SynthesisStereotactic and functional neurosurgery2024

Global Economic Evaluation of the Reported Costs of Deep Brain Stimulation.

Anthony E Bishay, Alexander T Lyons, Stefan W Koester, Danika L Paulo, Campbell Liles, Robert J Dambrino, Michael J Feldman, Tyler J Ball, Sarah K Bick, Dario J Englot and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The use of DBS in the treatment of childhood cerebral palsy: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Clinical Utility ofGenes · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The rise of bioelectronic medicine.Bioelectronic medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony E BishayVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Alexander T LyonsVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Stefan W KoesterVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Danika L PauloDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Campbell LilesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Robert J DambrinoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Michael J FeldmanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Tyler J BallDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Sarah K BickDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Dario J EnglotDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Lola B ChamblessDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Neurological Surgery · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the known benefits of deep brain stimulation (DBS), the cost of the procedure can limit access and can vary widely. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of the reported costs associated with DBS, as well as the variability in reporting cost-associated factors to ultimately increase patient access to this therapy.

methodsA systematic review of the literature for cost of DBS treatment was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and Embase databases were queried. Olsen & Associates (OANDA) was used to convert all reported rates to USD. Cost was corrected for inflation using the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Inflation Calculator, correcting to April 2022.

resultsTwenty-six articles on the cost of DBS surgery from 2001 to 2021 were included. The median number of patients across studies was 193, the mean reported age was 60.5 ± 5.6 years, and median female prevalence was 38.9%. The inflation- and currency-adjusted mean cost of the DBS device was USD 21,496.07 ± USD 8,944.16, the cost of surgery alone was USD 14,685.22 ± USD 8,479.66, the total cost of surgery was USD 40,942.85 ± USD 17,987.43, and the total cost of treatment until 1 year of follow-up was USD 47,632.27 ± USD 23,067.08. There were no differences in costs observed across surgical indication or country.

conclusionOur report describes the large variation in DBS costs and the manner of reporting costs. The current lack of standardization impedes productive discourse as comparisons are hindered by both geographic and chronological variations. Emphasis should be put on standardized reporting and analysis of reimbursement costs to better assess the variability of DBS-associated costs in order to make this procedure more cost-effective and address areas for improvement to increase patient access to DBS.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsHumansCostDeep brain stimulationEconomic analysisInsurancePrice

Identifiers

PMID38513625
PMCPMC11309055
OpenAlexW4393029877

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.