Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38516368›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary human sciences2024

Cultural evolution: A review of theoretical challenges.

Ryan Nichols, Mathieu Charbonneau, Azita Chellappoo, Taylor Davis, Miriam Haidle, Erik O Kimbrough, Henrike Moll, Richard Moore, Thom Scott-Phillips, Benjamin Grant Purzycki and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary human sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ryan NicholsDepartment of Philosophy, CSU Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9445-9821
Mathieu CharbonneauAfrica Institute for Research in Economics and Social Sciences, Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique, Rabat, Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6786-8889
Azita ChellappooSchool of Social Sciences and Global Studies, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1111-8920
Taylor DavisDepartment of Philosophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2699-5002
Miriam HaidleResearch Center 'The Role of Culture in Early Expansions of Humans', Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4923-7880
Erik O KimbroughSmith Institute for Political Economy and Philosophy, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-0430
Henrike MollDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9356-3077
Richard MooreDepartment of Philosophy, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4649-7676
Thom Scott-PhillipsIkerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Institute for Logic, Cognition, Language & Information, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9004-7093
Benjamin Grant PurzyckiBenjamin Grant Purzycki, Department of the Study of Religion, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9595-7360
Jose Segovia-MartinM6 Polytechnic University, Rabat, Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2303-3193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of cultural evolutionary science, its expansion into numerous fields, its use of diverse methods, and several conceptual problems have outpaced corollary developments in theory and philosophy of science. This has led to concern, exemplified in results from a recent survey conducted with members of the Cultural Evolution Society, that the field lacks 'knowledge synthesis', is poorly supported by 'theory', has an ambiguous relation to biological evolution and uses key terms (e.g. 'culture', 'social learning', 'cumulative culture') in ways that hamper operationalization in models, experiments and field studies. Although numerous review papers in the field represent and categorize its empirical findings, the field's theoretical challenges receive less critical attention even though challenges of a theoretical or conceptual nature underlie most of the problems identified by Cultural Evolution Society members. Guided by the heterogeneous 'grand challenges' emergent in this survey, this paper restates those challenges and adopts an organizational style requisite to discussion of them. The paper's goal is to contribute to increasing conceptual clarity and theoretical discernment around the most pressing challenges facing the field of cultural evolutionary science. It will be of most interest to cultural evolutionary scientists, theoreticians, philosophers of science and interdisciplinary researchers.

Indexed as

cultural evolutiongene–culture co-evolutionmethodsphilosophy of sciencetheory

Identifiers

PMID38516368
PMCPMC10955367

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.