Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38516518›Full record

ReviewActa medica Lituanic2023

Current and Perspective Approaches to the Treatment of Prolactinomas.

Tetiana Tykhonova, Nadiya Barabash, Olena Kanishcheva

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta medica Lituanic, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Impulse control disorder: patients with pituitary adenomas and dopaminergic agonists].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tetiana TykhonovaV.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-9113
Nadiya BarabashV.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9807-2683
Olena KanishchevaV.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2955-5478
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Along with the presence of the 2011 Materials and methods: A systematic research of the literature for the appropriate keywords published mainly for the last 10 years was done; also, a reference list of each selected article was analysed. We included to our review the articles reporting controversial issues or new data on the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. Results: The review describes various problems arising during the treatment of prolactinoma. The presence of primary and secondary dopamine agonist resistance in each case requires an individual approach, and sometimes may include the use of the antineoplastic agent t Conclusion: Drug therapy with dopamine agonists makes it possible to achieve the desired results in the vast majority of patients. However, despite the proven safety of this group of medicines, the risk of side effects should still be taken into account. The therapy regimen should be determined by the clinical course of prolactinoma and the patient's response to treatment. Other options of treatment should be considered in patients intolerant to medical therapy, with contraindication or resistance to dopamine agonists, in the case of a malignant tumor. The presence of refractory to any of the applied methods of treatment and aggressive prolactinomas leads to the search for new drugs.

Indexed as

dopamine agonist resistancedopamine receptor agonistshyperprolactinemiaprolactinoma treatment

Identifiers

PMID38516518
PMCPMC10952428
OpenAlexW4389738872

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.