Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38517469›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Remote Evaluation of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Mixed Methods Study.

Victoria Grace Gabb, Jonathan Blackman, Hamish Duncan Morrison, Bijetri Biswas, Haoxuan Li, Nicholas Turner, Georgina M Russell, Rosemary Greenwood, Amy Jolly, William Trender and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria Grace GabbBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7688-766X
Jonathan BlackmanBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9579-9860
Hamish Duncan MorrisonBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9358-7936
Bijetri BiswasBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-2693
Haoxuan LiBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7120-8657
Nicholas TurnerBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1591-6997
Georgina M RussellBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-4116
Rosemary GreenwoodBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6637-5225
Amy JollyDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7413-9772
William TrenderDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-5532
Adam HampshireDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5176-5420
Alan WhoneBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8931-4422
Elizabeth CoulthardBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0017-9595
North Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBImperial College London · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleep disturbances are a potentially modifiable risk factor for neurodegenerative dementia secondary to Alzheimer disease (AD) and Lewy body disease (LBD). Therefore, we need to identify the best methods to study sleep in this population.

objectiveThis study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of various wearable devices, smart devices, and remote study tasks in sleep and cognition research for people with AD and LBD.

methodsWe will deliver a feasibility and acceptability study alongside a prospective observational cohort study assessing sleep and cognition longitudinally in the home environment. Adults aged older than 50 years who were diagnosed with mild to moderate dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to probable AD or LBD and age-matched controls will be eligible. Exclusion criteria include lack of capacity to consent to research, other causes of MCI or dementia, and clinically significant sleep disorders. Participants will complete a cognitive assessment and questionnaires with a researcher and receive training and instructions for at-home study tasks across 8 weeks. At-home study tasks include remote sleep assessments using wearable devices (electroencephalography headband and actigraphy watch), app-based sleep diaries, online cognitive assessments, and saliva samples for melatonin- and cortisol-derived circadian markers. Feasibility outcomes will be assessed relating to recruitment and retention, data completeness, data quality, and support required. Feedback on acceptability and usability will be collected throughout the study period and end-of-study interviews will be analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsRecruitment started in February 2022. Data collection is ongoing, with final data expected in February 2024 and data analysis and publication of findings scheduled for the summer of 2024.

conclusionsThis study will allow us to assess if remote testing using smart devices and wearable technology is a viable alternative to traditional sleep measurements, such as polysomnography and questionnaires, in older adults with and without MCI or dementia due to AD or LBD. Understanding participant experience and the barriers and facilitators to technology use for research purposes and remote research in this population will assist with the development of, recruitment to, and retention within future research projects studying sleep and cognition outside of the clinic or laboratory. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52652.

Indexed as

accelerometeryacceptabilityAlzheimerAlzheimer diseaseappapplicationcognitivecognitive impairmentdementiaelectroencephalographyfeasibilityLewy body diseasemild cognitive impairmentmobile applicationsmobile phoneParkinsonresearchrisk factorsleepsleep disturbancesleepingsmart devicewearablewearable deviceswearables

Identifiers

PMID38517469
PMCPMC10998181
OpenAlexW4391793371

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.