Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38520603›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2024

Validity of Montreal Cognitive Assessment to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.

Anu Gupta, Alpesh Goyal, Roopa Rajan, Venugopalan Y Vishnu, Mani Kalaivani, Nikhil Tandon, Madakasira V P Srivastava, Yashdeep Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Cognitive Impairments and Health System Outcomes in Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Patients With Stroke and Those With Type II Diabetes Mellitus.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anu GuptaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Alpesh GoyalDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Roopa RajanDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Venugopalan Y VishnuDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Mani KalaivaniDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Nikhil TandonDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Madakasira V P SrivastavaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Yashdeep GuptaDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. yash_deep_gupta@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4345-717X
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research 5/4/5-4/Diab/19-NCD-II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGuidelines recommend screening older people (> 60-65 years) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) for cognitive impairment, as it has implications in the management of diabetes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a sensitive test for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the general population, but its validity in T2D has not been established.

methodsWe administered MoCA to patients with T2D (age ≥ 60 years) and controls (no T2D), along with a culturally validated neuropsychological battery and functional activity questionnaire. MCI was defined as performance in one or more cognitive domains ≥ 1.0 SD below the control group (on two tests representing a cognitive domain), with preserved functional activities. The discriminant validity of MoCA for the diagnosis of MCI at different cut-offs was ascertained.

resultsWe enrolled 267 patients with T2D and 120 controls; 39% of the participants with T2D met the diagnostic criteria for MCI on detailed neuropsychological testing. At the recommended cut-off on MoCA (< 26), the sensitivity (94.2%) was high, but the specificity was quite low (29.5%). The cut-off score of < 23 showed an optimal trade-off between sensitivity (69.2%), specificity (71.8%), and diagnostic accuracy (70.8%). The cut-off of < 21 exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy (74.9%) with an excellent specificity (91.4%), a good positive and negative predictive value (78.5% and 73.7%, respectively).

conclusionsThe recommended screening cut-off point on MoCA of < 26 has a suboptimal specificity and may increase the referral burden in memory clinics. A lower cut-off of < 21 on MoCA maximizes the diagnostic accuracy. Interactive Visual Abstract available for this article.

Indexed as

DiabetesDiscriminant analysisElderlyMild cognitive impairmentMontreal Cognitive AssessmentNeuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID38520603
PMCPMC11043253
OpenAlexW4393114796

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.