ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2024
Validity of Montreal Cognitive Assessment to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuronal Biomarkers and Micronutrient Status in Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Frequency, Severity and Spectrum of Cognitive Impairment and Its Associated Risk Factors in Elderly Individuals with Diabetes in India: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Observational
- Integrated cortical-cognitive signatures identified by machine learning enable early detection of MCI in type 2 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cognitive Impairments and Health System Outcomes in Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Patients With Stroke and Those With Type II Diabetes Mellitus.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2026Observational
- Determinants of selective domains of cognitive impairment among diabetes mellitus patients: a primary health care setting-based study in India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Altered static and dynamic effective connectivity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without microvascular complications.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Prevalence and pattern of cognitive dysfunction in young adults and middle-aged patients with type-2 diabetes.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Screening for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Good IDEA?Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Cognitive Functions in People Living with HIV Before and After COVID-19 Infection.Viruses · 2025Observational
- Association of individual-based morphological brain network alterations with cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGuidelines recommend screening older people (> 60-65 years) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) for cognitive impairment, as it has implications in the management of diabetes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a sensitive test for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the general population, but its validity in T2D has not been established.
methodsWe administered MoCA to patients with T2D (age ≥ 60 years) and controls (no T2D), along with a culturally validated neuropsychological battery and functional activity questionnaire. MCI was defined as performance in one or more cognitive domains ≥ 1.0 SD below the control group (on two tests representing a cognitive domain), with preserved functional activities. The discriminant validity of MoCA for the diagnosis of MCI at different cut-offs was ascertained.
resultsWe enrolled 267 patients with T2D and 120 controls; 39% of the participants with T2D met the diagnostic criteria for MCI on detailed neuropsychological testing. At the recommended cut-off on MoCA (< 26), the sensitivity (94.2%) was high, but the specificity was quite low (29.5%). The cut-off score of < 23 showed an optimal trade-off between sensitivity (69.2%), specificity (71.8%), and diagnostic accuracy (70.8%). The cut-off of < 21 exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy (74.9%) with an excellent specificity (91.4%), a good positive and negative predictive value (78.5% and 73.7%, respectively).
conclusionsThe recommended screening cut-off point on MoCA of < 26 has a suboptimal specificity and may increase the referral burden in memory clinics. A lower cut-off of < 21 on MoCA maximizes the diagnostic accuracy. Interactive Visual Abstract available for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.