ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2024
Fully automated contrast selection of joint bright- and black-blood late gadolinium enhancement imaging for robust myocardial scar assessment.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical applications of co-registered myocardial T2 mapping and dual bright- and black-blood late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- AI-powered SPOT imaging for enhanced myocardial scar detection and quantification.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Automatic selection of optimal TI for flow-independent dark-blood delayed-enhancement MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- SPOT-Cardio: Integrated Application for AI-Powered Automated Myocardial Scar Quantification on Joint Bright- and Black-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI Images.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Improved and Automated Detection of Papillary Muscle Infarction Using Joint Bright- and Black-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- One-click co-registered T2 mapping and dual black- and bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement MRI for comprehensive assessment of myocardial injury after acute STEMI.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeJoint bright- and black-blood MRI techniques provide improved scar localization and contrast. Black-blood contrast is obtained after the visual selection of an optimal inversion time (TI) which often results in uncertainties, inter- and intra-observer variability and increased workload. In this work, we propose an artificial intelligence-based algorithm to enable fully automated TI selection and simplify myocardial scar imaging.
methodsThe proposed algorithm first localizes the left ventricle using a U-Net architecture. The localized left cavity centroid is extracted and a squared region of interest ("focus box") is created around the resulting pixel. The focus box is then propagated on each image and the sum of the pixel intensity inside is computed. The smallest sum corresponds to the image with the lowest intensity signal within the blood pool and healthy myocardium, which will provide an ideal scar-to-blood contrast. The image's corresponding TI is considered optimal. The U-Net was trained to segment the epicardium in 177 patients with binary cross-entropy loss. The algorithm was validated retrospectively in 152 patients, and the agreement between the algorithm and two magnetic resonance (MR) operators' prediction of TI values was calculated using the Fleiss' kappa coefficient. Thirty focus box sizes, ranging from 2.3mm
resultsThe U-Net's Dice score was 93.0 ± 0.1%. The proposed algorithm extracted TI values in 2.7 ± 0.1 s per patient (vs. 16.0 ± 8.5 s for the operator). An agreement between the algorithm's prediction and the MR operators' prediction was found in 137/152 patients (κ= 0.89), for an optimal focus box of size 2.3cm
conclusionThe proposed fully-automated algorithm has potential of reducing uncertainties, variability, and workload inherent to manual approaches with promise for future clinical implementation for joint bright- and black-blood MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.