Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38522623›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2024

Fully automated contrast selection of joint bright- and black-blood late gadolinium enhancement imaging for robust myocardial scar assessment.

Victor de Villedon de Naide, Jean-David Maes, Manuel Villegas-Martinez, Indra Ribal, Aurélien Maillot, Valéry Ozenne, Géraldine Montier, Thibaut Boullé, Soumaya Sridi, Pauline Gut and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Victor de Villedon de NaideUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, IHU Liryc, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Jean-David MaesCHU de Bordeaux, Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, INSERM, U 1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Manuel Villegas-MartinezUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, IHU Liryc, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Indra RibalUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, IHU Liryc, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Aurélien MaillotUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, IHU Liryc, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Valéry OzenneUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, IHU Liryc, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Géraldine MontierCHU de Bordeaux, Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, INSERM, U 1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Thibaut BoulléCHU de Bordeaux, Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, INSERM, U 1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Soumaya SridiCHU de Bordeaux, Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, INSERM, U 1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Pauline GutUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, IHU Liryc, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas KüstnerMedical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Matthias StuberUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, IHU Liryc, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hubert CochetUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, IHU Liryc, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CHU de Bordeaux, Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, INSERM, U 1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Aurélien BustinUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, IHU Liryc, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; CHU de Bordeaux, Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, INSERM, U 1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: aurelien.bustin@ihu-liryc.fr.
Université de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeJoint bright- and black-blood MRI techniques provide improved scar localization and contrast. Black-blood contrast is obtained after the visual selection of an optimal inversion time (TI) which often results in uncertainties, inter- and intra-observer variability and increased workload. In this work, we propose an artificial intelligence-based algorithm to enable fully automated TI selection and simplify myocardial scar imaging.

methodsThe proposed algorithm first localizes the left ventricle using a U-Net architecture. The localized left cavity centroid is extracted and a squared region of interest ("focus box") is created around the resulting pixel. The focus box is then propagated on each image and the sum of the pixel intensity inside is computed. The smallest sum corresponds to the image with the lowest intensity signal within the blood pool and healthy myocardium, which will provide an ideal scar-to-blood contrast. The image's corresponding TI is considered optimal. The U-Net was trained to segment the epicardium in 177 patients with binary cross-entropy loss. The algorithm was validated retrospectively in 152 patients, and the agreement between the algorithm and two magnetic resonance (MR) operators' prediction of TI values was calculated using the Fleiss' kappa coefficient. Thirty focus box sizes, ranging from 2.3mm

resultsThe U-Net's Dice score was 93.0 ± 0.1%. The proposed algorithm extracted TI values in 2.7 ± 0.1 s per patient (vs. 16.0 ± 8.5 s for the operator). An agreement between the algorithm's prediction and the MR operators' prediction was found in 137/152 patients (κ= 0.89), for an optimal focus box of size 2.3cm

conclusionThe proposed fully-automated algorithm has potential of reducing uncertainties, variability, and workload inherent to manual approaches with promise for future clinical implementation for joint bright- and black-blood MRI.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaGadoliniumArtificial IntelligenceCicatrixHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocardiumRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaGadoliniumBlack-blood imagingCardiac MRIInversion timeLate gadolinium enhancementMyocardial scar

Identifiers

PMID38522623
PMCPMC11116338
OpenAlexW4393165587

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.