ArticleMethodsX2024
Ensemble fusion model for improved lung abnormality classification: Leveraging pre-trained models.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung abnormalities pose significant health concerns, underscoring the need for swift and accurate diagnoses to facilitate timely medical intervention. This study introduces a novel methodology for the sub-classification of lung abnormalities within chest X-rays captured via smartphones. An accurate and timely diagnosis of lung abnormalities is essential for the successful implementation of appropriate therapy. In this paper, we propose a novel approach using a Convolutional neural network (CNN) with three maximum pooling layers and early fusion for sub-classifying lung abnormalities from chest Xrays. Based on the kind of abnormality, the CheXpert dataset is divided into 13 sub-classes, each of which is trained using a different sub-model. An early fusion procedure is then used to integrate the outputs of the sub-model.•3M-CNN (Method 1): We employed a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with three max pooling layers and an early fusion strategy to train dedicated sub-models for each of the 13 distinct sub-classes of lung abnormalities using the CheXpert dataset.•Ensemble Model (Method 2): Our 'Ensemble model' integrated the outputs of the trained sub-models, providing a powerful approach for the sub-classification of lung abnormalities.•Exceptional Accuracy: Our '3M-CNN' and 'fused model' achieved an accuracy of 98.79%, surpassing established methodologies, which is beneficial in resource-constrained environments embracing smartphone-based imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.