ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Prediction of immunotherapy response in idiopathic membranous nephropathy using deep learning-pathological and clinical factors.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary review of primary membranous nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Risk prediction of PLA2R-Ab-negative membranous nephropathy: an interpretable multicenter machine learning model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Nicotinism vs. Glomerulopathies-Smoking as a Risk Factor for Primary Glomerulopathies.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Predicting Remission in Antiphospholipase A2 Receptor Antibody-Associated Membranous Nephropathy: A Secondary Analysis of the GEMRITUX, MENTOR, and STARMEN Trials.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Owing to individual heterogeneity, patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) exhibit varying sensitivities to immunotherapy. This study aimed to establish and validate a model incorporating pathological and clinical features using deep learning training to evaluate the response of patients with IMN to immunosuppressive therapy. Methods: The 291 patients were randomly categorized into training (n = 219) and validation (n = 72) cohorts. Patch-level convolutional neural network training in a weakly supervised manner was utilized to analyze whole-slide histopathological features. We developed a machine-learning model to assess the predictive value of pathological signatures compared to clinical factors. The performance levels of the models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the training and validation tests, and the prediction accuracies of the models for immunotherapy response were compared. Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that diabetes and smoking were independent risk factors affecting the response to immunotherapy in IMN patients. The model integrating pathologic features had a favorable predictive value for determining the response to immunotherapy in IMN patients, with AUCs of 0.85 and 0.77 when employed in the training and test cohorts, respectively. However, when incorporating clinical features into the model, the predictive efficacy diminishes, as evidenced by lower AUC values of 0.75 and 0.62 on the training and testing cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: The model incorporating pathological signatures demonstrated a superior predictive ability for determining the response to immunosuppressive therapy in IMN patients compared to the integration of clinical factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.