ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2024
A vendor-neutral EPI sequence for hyperpolarized
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Open-source implementation of X-nuclear sequences using the Pulseq framework.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a flexible, vendor-neutral EPI sequence for hyperpolarized
methodsAn open-source EPI sequence consisting of a metabolite-specific spectral-spatial RF excitation pulse and a customizable EPI readout was created using the Pulseq framework. To explore the flexibility of our sequence, we tested several versions of the sequence including a symmetric 3D readout with different spatial resolutions for each metabolite (1.0 cm
resultsAll the sequence variations localized natural-abundance
conclusionWe have developed and tested a vendor-neutral EPI sequence for imaging HP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.