Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525745›Full record

ArticleGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Deprescribing in Older Poly-Treated Patients Affected with Dementia.

Pietro Gareri, Luca Gallelli, Ilaria Gareri, Vincenzo Rania, Caterina Palleria, Giovambattista De Sarro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pietro GareriDepartment of Frailty, Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CDCD) Catanzaro Lido-ASP Catanzaro, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4277-3426
Luca GallelliUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, "Renato Dulbecco" University Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-7902
Ilaria GareriDepartment of Health Science, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Vincenzo RaniaUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, "Renato Dulbecco" University Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9938-5259
Caterina PalleriaDepartment of Health Science, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Giovambattista De SarroUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, "Renato Dulbecco" University Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7629-6579
Magna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polypharmacy is an important issue in older patients affected by dementia because they are very vulnerable to the side effects of drugs'. Between October 2021 and September 2022, we randomly assessed 205 old-aged outpatients. The study was carried out in a Center for Dementia in collaboration with a university center. The primary outcomes were: (1) deprescribing inappropriate drugs through the Beers and STOPP&START criteria; (2) assessing duplicate drugs and the risk of iatrogenic damage due to drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Overall, 69 men and 136 women (mean age 82.7 ± 7.4 years) were assessed. Of these, 91 patients were home care patients and 114 were outpatient. The average number of the drugs used in the sample was 9.4 drugs per patient; after the first visit and the consequent deprescribing process, the average dropped to 8.7 drugs per patient (

Indexed as

dementiadeprescribingolder patientspoly-treatmentterritoryuniversity

Identifiers

PMID38525745
PMCPMC10961769
OpenAlexW4392154410

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.