Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528133›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024

Does acute cannabidiol (CBD) use impair performance? A meta-analysis and comparison with placebo and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

Lindsay A Lo, April L Christiansen, Justin C Strickland, Carly A Pistawka, Lauren Eadie, Ryan Vandrey, Caroline A MacCallum

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07271030 (The Use of Cannabidiol Suppositories for Sexual Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07271030 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Cannabidiol Suppositories for Sexual Pain: A Randomised Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Metropolitan UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsWell-Being, Psychological, Quality of Life, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Pain DisorderArmsCannabidiol suppository intervention 1, Cannabidiol suppository intervention 2, Cannabidiol suppository intervention 3, Non cannabidiol group control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Longitudinal neurocognitive trajectories in a large cohort of youth who use cannabis: combining self-report and toxicology.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Prevalence of cannabidiol use and correlates in U.S. adults.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsay A LoDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
April L ChristiansenFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Justin C StricklandJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1077-0394
Carly A PistawkaFaculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lauren EadieDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ryan VandreyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Caroline A MacCallumDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Info@drcarolinemaccallum.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-3959
University of British Columbia · CAJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD) is widely used and believed to be non-intoxicating, lacking acute performance effects (e.g., non-impairing). However, a synthesis of data has not evaluated this. This meta-analysis synthesized data from controlled human laboratory studies that evaluated if acute CBD use impairs performance. Performance on objective and subjective measures of cognitive and psychomotor function were used as markers for potential performance changes and impairment. Studies were identified through systematic database searches. Adult clinical trials measuring acute CBD effects (within 0-8 h of administration) were included. The primary outcome was the peak mean difference in performance measures between CBD and placebo. A secondary analysis utilizing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) as a positive control for comparison to CBD was completed. Pooled Hedges' g estimates were calculated using robust variance estimation (RVE) meta-regression. The omnibus RVE meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant, but small effect size (Hedge's g < 0.2) for impaired performance following acute CBD consumption compared to placebo (N = 16 trials, Hedges' g = 0.122, 95% CI: 0.023-0.221, p = 0.019). Measure type was a significant moderator with larger mean differences between CBD and placebo when subjective measures, specifically self-reported sedation, were used versus objective performance tasks (Hedges' g

Indexed as

CannabidiolDronabinolPsychomotor PerformanceCognitionHumansCannabidiolDronabinol

Identifiers

PMID38528133
PMCPMC11251190
OpenAlexW4393142205

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.