Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529234›Full record

ArticleAnnals of joint2023

Radiofrequency ablation prior to total knee arthroplasty does not improve post-surgical pain or recovery: a double-blinded, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.

Jeffrey R Lyman, Adam J Olscamp, Timothy P Lovell, Corbett D Winegar, Alexi N Wilson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of joint, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02925442 (Comparison Between Cooled), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02925442 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison Between Cooled (C-RFA) and Standard (t-RFA) Radiofrequency Ablation, and Control for Pain Management Following Unilateral Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blinded, Parallel-Grouped, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLyman Medical Research Foundation, Inc.Ran2017 to 2020Enrolled150ConditionsOsteoarthritis of the KneeArmst-RFA, C-RFA, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey R LymanOrthopedic Sports Institute, Coeur d'Alene, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1470-5637
Adam J OlscampOrthopedic Sports Institute, Coeur d'Alene, ID, USA.
Timothy P LovellInstitute for Orthopedic Research and Innovation, Coeur d'Alene, ID, USA.
Corbett D WinegarBlackrock Orthopedics, Meridian, ID, USA.
Alexi N WilsonOrthopedic Sports Institute, Coeur d'Alene, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5479-6284
Institute of Orthopedic Research and Education · USProvidence College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) targeting the genicular nerves is an effective treatment for knee pain due to osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of two RFA interventions delivered preoperatively on early postoperative pain management and subjective outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: One hundred forty-three participants were enrolled in this double blinded, sham-controlled prospective randomized trial. Participants assigned at random to traditional RFA (t-RFA) (n=50), cooled RFA (c-RFA) (n=49), or sham (n=44) procedures prior to TKA. Outcomes were recorded at postoperative day 3, week 1, week 2, week 12, month 6, and month 12 following TKA. Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), opioid consumption (reported as MEQ, or daily morphine equivalents), time to narcotic cessation (reported in days), and pain scores (reported as NRS, or Numeric Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) measures. All side effects and complications were reported. Participants were followed for a year to detect any unexpected side effects. Results: Compared with sham controls, t-RFA and c-RFA did not affect inpatient LOS, pain scores, or opioid consumption. There were no reductions in time to opioid cessation, pain scores, or WOMAC scores at any time point post-TKA. Conclusions: RFA of the genicular nerves prior to TKA did not affect opioid use or time to cessation, pain, or WOMAC scores, following TKA. Current techniques of t-RFA and c-RFA of these specific geniculate nerves preoperatively are not indicated as routine interventions to improve short-term surgical recovery after TKA. Trial Registration: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02925442).

Indexed as

genicular nervepain managementradiofrequency ablation (RFA)Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Identifiers

PMID38529234
PMCPMC10929435
OpenAlexW4319934862

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.