ReviewNeuroImage. Clinical2024
ENIGMA's simple seven: Recommendations to enhance the reproducibility of resting-state fMRI in traumatic brain injury.
Review in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drivers of resting-state fMRI heterogeneity in traumatic brain injury across injury characteristics and imaging methods: a systematic review and semiquantitative analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Negative symptoms and resting state functional connectivity: Leveraging ecological momentary assessment and individual-specific techniques.Schizophrenia research · 2026Article
- Large scale functional and effective connectivity alterations cross the Huntington's disease integrated staging system.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Establishing the link between post-concussive symptoms and brain network dysfunction: A systematic scoping review of neuroimaging evidence.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Stationarity assessment of resting state condition via permutation entropy on EEG recordings.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reproducibility of resting-state functional connectivity in healthy aging and brain injury: A mini-multiverse analysis.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Cognitive impairment and brain atrophy in patients with newly diagnosed aggressive lymphoma undergoing standard chemotherapy: a normative analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- FastSurfer parcellation accuracy after lesion filling in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Reporting checklists in neuroimaging: promoting transparency, replicability, and reproducibility.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Pre- and post-therapy functional MRI connectivity in severe acute brain injury with suppression of consciousness: a comparative analysis to epilepsy features.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2024Article
- Structural brain differences in professional Australian rules footballers following mild traumatic brain injury: When head size matters.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors at 20 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) provides researchers and clinicians with a powerful tool to examine functional connectivity across large-scale brain networks, with ever-increasing applications to the study of neurological disorders, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI). While rsfMRI holds unparalleled promise in systems neurosciences, its acquisition and analytical methodology across research groups is variable, resulting in a literature that is challenging to integrate and interpret. The focus of this narrative review is to address the primary methodological issues including investigator decision points in the application of rsfMRI to study the consequences of TBI. As part of the ENIGMA Brain Injury working group, we have collaborated to identify a minimum set of recommendations that are designed to produce results that are reliable, harmonizable, and reproducible for the TBI imaging research community. Part one of this review provides the results of a literature search of current rsfMRI studies of TBI, highlighting key design considerations and data processing pipelines. Part two outlines seven data acquisition, processing, and analysis recommendations with the goal of maximizing study reliability and between-site comparability, while preserving investigator autonomy. Part three summarizes new directions and opportunities for future rsfMRI studies in TBI patients. The goal is to galvanize the TBI community to gain consensus for a set of rigorous and reproducible methods, and to increase analytical transparency and data sharing to address the reproducibility crisis in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.