Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38531864›Full record

ReviewNature communications2024

Developmental timing in plants.

Enrico Coen, Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evolution and development of complex floral displays.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  14. Male Germ Cell Specification in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrico CoenDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK. enrico.coen@jic.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8454-8767
Przemyslaw PrusinkiewiczDepartment of Computer Science, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. pwp@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1338-7086
John Innes Centre · GBUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M023117/1, BB/W007924/1, BBS/E/J/000PR9787, BBS/E/J/00000152, BB/L008920/1, BBS/E/J/000PR9789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants exhibit reproducible timing of developmental events at multiple scales, from switches in cell identity to maturation of the whole plant. Control of developmental timing likely evolved for similar reasons that humans invented clocks: to coordinate events. However, whereas clocks are designed to run independently of conditions, plant developmental timing is strongly dependent on growth and environment. Using simplified models to convey key concepts, we review how growth-dependent and inherent timing mechanisms interact with the environment to control cyclical and progressive developmental transitions in plants.

Indexed as

Plant DevelopmentPlants

Identifiers

PMID38531864
PMCPMC10965974
OpenAlexW4393231640

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.