Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38531929›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Genetic similarity between relatives provides evidence on the presence and history of assortative mating.

Hans Fredrik Sunde, Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal, Rosa Cheesman, Elizabeth C Corfield, Thomas H Kleppesto, Anne Caroline Seierstad, Eivind Ystrom, Espen Moen Eilertsen, Fartein Ask Torvik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Personality Genomics.Annual review of psychology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hans Fredrik SundeCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. hansfredrik.sunde@fhi.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8797-5422
Nikolai Haahjem EftedalPROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1328-9861
Rosa CheesmanPROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Elizabeth C CorfieldNic Waals Institute, Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0119-157X
Thomas H KleppestoCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5342-3478
Anne Caroline SeierstadPROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eivind YstromPROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-6171
Espen Moen EilertsenPROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3444-4251
Fartein Ask TorvikCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-5978
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOStatistics Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assortative mating - the non-random mating of individuals with similar traits - is known to increase trait-specific genetic variance and genetic similarity between relatives. However, empirical evidence is limited for many traits, and the implications hinge on whether assortative mating has started recently or many generations ago. Here we show theoretically and empirically that genetic similarity between relatives can provide evidence on the presence and history of assortative mating. First, we employed path analysis to understand how assortative mating affects genetic similarity between family members across generations, finding that similarity between distant relatives is more affected than close relatives. Next, we correlated polygenic indices of 47,135 co-parents from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and found genetic evidence of assortative mating in nine out of sixteen examined traits. The same traits showed elevated similarity between relatives, especially distant relatives. Six of the nine traits, including educational attainment, showed greater genetic variance among offspring, which is inconsistent with stable assortative mating over many generations. These results suggest an ongoing increase in familial similarity for these traits. The implications of this research extend to genetic methodology and the understanding of social and economic disparities.

Indexed as

PhenotypeReproductionChildCohort StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMothers

Identifiers

PMID38531929
PMCPMC10966108
OpenAlexW4393196620

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.