Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532888›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing identifies stage- and subtype-specific DNA methylation signatures in pancreatic cancer.

Sarah S Wang, Madison L Hall, EunJung Lee, Soon-Chan Kim, Neha Ramesh, Sang Hyub Lee, Jin-Young Jang, Richard J Bold, Ja-Lok Ku, Chang-Il Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The role of AMPK in pancreatic cancer: from carcinogenesis to treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah S WangDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Madison L HallDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
EunJung LeeDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Soon-Chan KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Korean Cell Line Bank, Laboratory of Cell Biology and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Neha RameshDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Sang Hyub LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin-Young JangDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Richard J BoldDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Ja-Lok KuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Korean Cell Line Bank, Laboratory of Cell Biology and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chang-Il HwangDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USCancer Research Institute · USUC Davis Comprehensive Cancer CenterSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KC KENT LLOYD · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Engrailed-1 and Epigenetic Vulnerabilities in Metastatic Pancreatic CancerR37CA249007 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Chang-il Hwang · 2021 to 2026
$2.1M
Identification of Key Regulators in Pancreatic Cancer MetastasisK22CA226037 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HWANG, CHANG-IL · 2018 to 2020
$486k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA226037NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R37 CA249007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), no recurrent metastasis-specific mutation has been found, suggesting that epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, are the major contributors of late-stage disease progression. Here, we performed the first whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) on mouse and human PDAC organoid models to identify stage-specific and molecular subtype-specific DNA methylation signatures. With this approach, we identified thousands of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that can distinguish between the stages and molecular subtypes of PDAC. Stage-specific DMRs are associated with genes related to nervous system development and cell-cell adhesions, and are enriched in promoters and bivalent enhancers. Subtype-specific DMRs showed hypermethylation of GATA6 foregut endoderm transcriptional networks in the squamous subtype and hypermethylation of EMT transcriptional networks in the progenitor subtype. These results indicate that aberrant DNA methylation contributes to both PDAC progression and subtype differentiation, resulting in significant and reoccurring DNA methylation patterns with diagnostic and prognostic potential.

Indexed as

cancercancer systems biologyEpigeneticsgenomics

Identifiers

PMID38532888
PMCPMC10963232
OpenAlexW4392370763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.